Categories
Campus Sexual Assault

PR: Lawmakers Need to Restore Presumption of Innocence in Campus Sex Cases to Avoid ‘Frightening Consequences’

Contact: Gina Lauterio
Email: info@saveservices.org

Lawmakers Need to Restore Presumption of Innocence in Campus Sex Cases to Avoid ‘Frightening Consequences’

WASHINGTON / April 9, 2015 – Following release of a report detailing the many mistakes of a Rolling Stone article that had alleged a gang-rape at a University of Virginia fraternity, SAVE is now calling on legislators and campus administrators to engage in reasoned debate on the campus sexual assault issue to restore due process and the presumption of innocence.

Commentators have noted how Rolling Stone reporter Sabrina Erdley approached the topic with a pre-conceived narrative. By her own admission, Erdley set out to locate a case that would reveal “what it’s like to be on campus now…where not only is rape so prevalent but also that there’s this pervasive culture of sexual harassment/rape culture.”

These pre-conceptions may have lulled Erdley into accepting the uncorroborated claims of self-identified rape victim “Jackie” as truthful. Erdley envisioned her article would pressure campus administrators to institute policies to curb campus rape that serve to reduce due process protections.

Commentators on all points of the political spectrum have voiced concerns about the loss of the presumption of innocence for students accused of sexual assault: http://www.saveservices.org/sexual-assault/editorials/2015-2/

In response to a call for the intentional use of false convictions to curb campus sexual assault, for example, liberal editorialist Jonathan Chait charged, “This is a conception of justice totally removed from the liberal tradition.”

And conservative editorialist Robert Tracinski recently denounced how UVA president Theresa Sullivan “acted with a presumption of guilt against her own university and its students.”

“The presumption of innocence has long been a bulwark of American law,” notes SAVE spokeswoman Sheryle Hutter. “Any infringement on the presumption marks a worrisome trend to authoritarianism in our society with frightening consequences.”

Stop Abusive and Violent Environments is working to promote effective solutions to campus sexual assault: http://www.saveservices.org/

Categories
Sexual Assault

PR: SAVE Calls for Removal of Bogus ‘One-in-Five’ Rape Statistic from The Hunting Ground

Contact: Gina Lauterio
Email: info@saveservices.org

SAVE Calls for Removal of Bogus ‘One-in-Five’ Rape Statistic from The Hunting Ground

WASHINGTON / April 2, 2015 – Stop Abusive and Violent Environments, a national organization working to end campus sexual assault, is calling on producers of The Hunting Ground to remove a rape statistic featured in the movie that is known to be false. The Hunting Ground makes the claim that 20% of college women are sexually assaulted.

Numerous authoritative sources have refuted the 20% number:

1. The U.S. Department of Justice reports a college woman’s risk of sexual assault is under 1% each year (1).

2. The Washington Post Fact Checker assigned a single Pinocchio to the one-in-five claim (2).

3. The New York Times Editorial Board described the source of the statistic as “a flawed 2007 study based on undergraduates at just two unnamed public universities.” (3)

4. Writing in Time magazine, Christopher Krebs, lead researcher of the cited 2007 study, explained:
“First and foremost, the 1-in-5 statistic is not a nationally representative estimate of the prevalence of sexual assault, and we have never presented it as being representative.” (4)

Numerous editorialists have also commented on the sheer implausibility of the one-in-five number (5).

“First and foremost, any movie that claims to be a ‘documentary’ must get its facts straight and tell the truth.” notes SAVE spokesperson Sheryl Hutter. “Producers Kirby Dick and Amy Ziering need to do the right thing and edit out the false numbers.”

Other key claims in movie have been disputed or shown to be false (6). SAVE has launched a media awareness campaign, “The Hunting Ground: Cut the Lies,” calling for removal of the flawed sexual assault statistics.

Stop Abusive and Violent Environments is working to promote effective solutions to campus sexual assault: http://www.saveservices.org/

1. http://www.bjs.gov/index.cfm?ty=pbdetail&iid=5176
2. http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/fact-checker/wp/2014/12/17/one-in-five-women-in-college-sexually-assaulted-an-update/
3. http://www.nytimes.com/2015/02/08/opinion/sunday/confusion-about-college-sexual-assault.html
4. http://time.com/3633903/campus-rape-1-in-5-sexual-assault-setting-record-straight/
5. http://www.saveservices.org/sexual-assault/editorials/2014-2/
6. http://www.saveservices.org/sexual-assault/hunting-ground/

Categories
Campus Sexual Assault

PR: Panelists Call for End to Second-Class Justice in Campus Sex Cases

Panelists Call for End to Second-Class Justice in Campus Sex Cases

WASHINGTON / March 18, 2015 – Panelists at a recent media briefing called for major changes to the federally mandated system of campus disciplinary committees, which are now required to hear all allegations of campus sexual assault. The six presentations were made during a March 13 briefing held at the National Press Club in Washington, D.C.

In her opening statement, national columnist Cathy Young criticized media accounts for failing to report both sides of campus rape allegations.

George Washington University Law School professor John Banzhaf argued that administrators at state universities are at risk of being sued for giving short shrift to fundamental due process protections from the accused.

New York City lawyer Susan Kapan deplored the “if she’s crying, she’s not lying” standard of proof currently employed by some campus tribunals.

Constitutional attorney Hans Bader revealed how recent federal mandates have created financial incentives for colleges to expel the accused, rather than to seek justice.

Representing Families Advocating for Campus Equality, Cynthia Garrett noted how affirmative consent policies are inherently biased against the man because they presume male initiation of all sexual encounters.

And former Auburn University student Joshua Strange revealed how the campus proceeding he faced was so biased that the decision to expel was evident even at the very beginning.

“Persons accused of rape deserve to receive due process protections, and victims deserve the full resources of the criminal justice system,” notes SAVE spokesperson Sheryl Hutter. “Anything less represents a deplorable case of second-class justice.”

The presentations are available in high-quality broadcast format: https://youtu.be/uERIh6DkAb0

Stop Abusive and Violent Environments is working to promote effective solutions to campus sexual assault: http://www.saveservices.org/

Categories
Sexual Assault

PR: Joshua Strange, Falsely-Accused of Campus Rape, and His Mother Tell Their Story

Contact: Gina Lauterio
Email: info@saveservices.org

Joshua Strange, Falsely-Accused of Campus Rape, and His Mother Tell Their Story

WASHINGTON / March 5, 2015 – In a compelling video testimonial, former Auburn University student Joshua Strange and his mother Allison recount their ordeal arising from false accusations of rape and physical assault.

The video reveals that when the criminal justice system weighed in on the rape allegation, a grand jury handed up a “no bill,” indicating an absence of probable cause.

Despite that finding, Joshua Strange was expelled by Auburn University on November 7, 2011 and is barred from ever returning. His college transcript reflects these allegations and the subsequent student disciplinary committee ruling of expulsion.

The video can be viewed here: http://youtu.be/ewEwnliupZ8

The numerous contradictions and inconsistencies from Joshua Strange’s accuser have never been questioned, nor has she been held accountable for the false accusations, SAVE notes.

There are currently 59 lawsuits where young men are suing universities and colleges across the U.S. alleging due process violations and false rape charges: http://www.avoiceformalestudents.com/

“Campus activists have systematically distorted the truth in order to remove the presumption of innocence from the accused,” according to SAVE spokesperson Sheryle Hutter. “There is no ‘rape culture’ in American society, but these myths have promoted a culture of ‘rape panic’ on college campuses.”

SAVE, a national organization working to end sexual assault, has criticized the recently-released movie The Hunting Ground for presenting false statistics and offering a one-side portrayal of the campus sexual assault issue.

Earlier this week, Florida State University John Thrasher issued a formal statement charging The Hunting Ground movie is “seriously lacking in credibility” for presenting a “one-sided view of Florida State’s actions in the Jameis Winston case.”

Stop Abusive and Violent Environments is working to promote effective solutions to campus sexual assault: http://www.saveservices.org/

Categories
Campus Sexual Assault

PR: ‘Fundamentally Dishonest:’ Hunting Ground Movie Distorts the Truth and Shortchanges Victims, SAVE Charges

Contact: Gina Lauterio
Email: info@saveservices.org

‘Fundamentally Dishonest:’ Hunting Ground Movie Distorts the Truth and Shortchanges Victims, SAVE Charges

WASHINGTON / March 3, 2015 – SAVE, a national organization working to end sexual assault, is criticizing the recently released movie The Hunting Ground for presenting false statistics, offering a one-side portrayal of the problem, and failing to call for greater police involvement in campus sex cases.

Produced by CNN Films, The Hunting Ground purports to be a documentary. In fact, the movie contains numerous factual errors and omits essential perspectives. The film does not attempt to verify the accuracy or completeness of persons’ accounts.

The film makes the claim that 20% of college women are sexually assaulted, even though the U.S. Department of Justice reports a woman’s risk is under one percent each year: http://www.bjs.gov/index.cfm?ty=pbdetail&iid=5176

The movie misleadingly states that “more than 35 other schools all declined to be interviewed for this film,” when in fact two college presidents agreed to conduct interviews: https://www.insidehighered.com/news/2015/01/29/new-documentary-suggests-incorrectly-no-college-leaders-would-sit-camera-interviews

The film does not interview any men accused of rape, does not mention any of the widely publicized examples of false rape allegations, and neglects to highlight the growing number of lawsuits filed against universities charging wrongful expulsion.

The Hunting Ground makes no mention of the recent Rolling Stone/UVA story, widely viewed as an example of advocacy journalism based on implausible and unsubstantiated allegations.

Although the movie highlights how universities are doing a poor job handling sexual assault cases, the producers do not take the logical step of calling for greater involvement of criminal justice authorities. This omission leaves victims attempting to secure justice at the hands of ill-equipped campus committees, SAVE says.

“The Hunting Ground presents bogus statistics, presents only one side of the story, and is designed to play on viewers’ emotions,” notes SAVE spokeswoman Sheryl Hutter. “That’s fundamentally dishonest.”

SAVE has produced a 4-minute video, The Hunting Ground: Assaulting the Truth? which can be viewed here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=9MBGMlpc4KE

Stop Abusive and Violent Environments is working to promote effective solutions to campus sexual assault: http://www.saveservices.org/

Categories
Campus Sexual Assault

PR: ‘One in Five, It’s a Lie:’ SAVE Launches Campaign to Restore Truth to Sexual Assault Debate

Contact: Gina Lauterio

Email: info@saveservices.org

‘One in Five, It’s a Lie:’ SAVE Launches Campaign to Restore Truth to Sexual Assault Debate

WASHINGTON / January 7, 2015 – Stop Abusive and Violent Environments is today launching a national campaign to expose common myths and false claims about campus sexual assault. The 12 myths, along with the factual information, can be viewed here: http://www.saveservices.org/sexual-assault/myths/

One of the most common is the “one in five” myth, the claim that one-fifth of college women experience sexual assault. But a recent Department of Justice report concluded the actual risk is 2.4% over the four-year college period.

Other myths include:

  1. Only 2-8% of Rape Allegations are False
  2. Our Nation Endorses a “Rape Culture”
  3. Encouraging Women to Follow Common-Sense Rape Prevention Measures is “Blaming the Victim”

SAVE believes these myths, and the concerns they engendered, contributed to a cultural milieu in which the UVA-Rolling Stone magazine debacle took place last month.

“Campus activists have systematically distorted the truth to promote ineffective policies and remove the presumption of innocence from the accused,” according to SAVE spokesperson Sheryle Hutter. “There is no ‘rape culture’ in American society, but these myths have served to promote a culture of ‘rape panic’ on college campuses.”

SAVE has drafted a bill that would require campus sexual assault cases be handled by local law enforcement authorities, not untrained campus disciplinary panels: http://www.saveservices.org/sexual-assault/sos/

Stop Abusive and Violent Environments is working to promote effective solutions to campus sexual assault: http://www.saveservices.org/

Categories
Campus Sexual Assault

PR: SAVE Commends Senators Whitehouse and Grassley for Taking Lead to End ‘Second-Class Justice’ in Campus Sexual Assault Cases

Contact: Gina Lauterio
Telephone: 301-801-0608
Email: info@saveservices.org

SAVE Commends Senators Whitehouse and Grassley for Taking Lead to End ‘Second-Class Justice’ in Campus Sexual Assault Cases

WASHINGTON / December 12, 2014 – Stop Abusive and Violent Environments applauds Senators Sheldon Whitehouse and Chuck Grassley for taking the initiative to strengthen the involvement of criminal justice authorities in campus sexual assault cases. The senators issued the statements during a December 9 hearing of the Senate Judiciary Committee that addressed the Roles and Responsibilities of Law Enforcement in Campus Sexual Assault: http://www.judiciary.senate.gov/meetings/campus-sexual-assault-the-roles-and-responsibilities-of-law-enforcement

In his prepared statement, Sen. Whitehouse noted,

“As a former United States Attorney and Attorney General for my state, I am concerned that law enforcement is being marginalized when it comes to the crime of campus sexual assault. I am concerned that the specter of flawed law enforcement overshadows the harm of marginalized law enforcement.”

Echoing a similar sentiment, Sen. Grassley commented,

“It’s high time to make sure that a crime is a crime wherever it is committed and treated the same way. And when it is treated universally the same way we will have less rape on campuses.”

The current federal policy requires campus disciplinary committees to handle all allegations of sexual assault. This regime has fostered the widespread perception of “second-class justice” at colleges and universities that shortchanges both victims and the accused.

Hundreds of editorials have criticized the campus disciplinary committees because they lack the necessary expertise, independence, and legal authority to adjudicate complex ‘he-said, she-said’ claims, commentators say: www.accusingu.org.

SAVE has drafted the Safety of Our Students (SOS) bill, which would require that campus sexual assault cases be investigated by local law enforcement authorities: http://www.saveservices.org/camp/campus-rape-courts/

Stop Abusive and Violent Environments, a 501(c)(3) organization, is working to promote effective solutions to campus sexual assault: http://www.saveservices.org/

Categories
Affirmative Consent Campus Sexual Assault

PR: Bureaucrats in the Bedroom: Most Say ‘No’ to Government Mandates for Consent to Sex

Contact: Gina Lauterio

Telephone: 301-801-0608

Email: info@saveservices.org

Bureaucrats in the Bedroom: Most Say ‘No’ to Government Mandates for Consent to Sex

WASHINGTON / November 12, 2014 – A national opinion poll has revealed the vast majority of persons are opposed to laws that seek to mandate how persons give consent to sexual relations. When asked whether the government should have the “authority to determine how partners give their consent to sex,” 85% of respondents answered ‘No.

In late September, Gov. Jerry Brown signed a controversial Affirmative Consent bill requiring that all California college students give their ongoing “affirmative, conscious, and voluntary” consent during the course of having sex. Similar laws are being considered in other states.

The survey was conducted October 27 – 28. Over 600 persons participated in the telephone poll. The respondents consisted of 55.6% males and 44.4% females. Detailed findings can be viewed here: http://www.saveservices.org/sexual-assault/affirmative-consent/survey-overview/

Many respondents agreed that consent to sex should be conscious, voluntary, and ongoing. But 6 out of 7 respondents had not heard of the California Affirmative Consent law, so it is unlikely these persons held an opinion whether or not consent should be “affirmative.”

Affirmative Consent policies have proven to be contentious. Many have criticized the approach as being unlikely to deter a rapist intent on assaulting a woman, and for removing the presumption of innocence from the accused.

“Hopefully lawmakers will get the message that Americans don’t want ‘Big Sister’ government dictating the most intimate details of their private lives,” explains SAVE spokesperson Sheryle Hutter. “Instead, lawmakers should be considering proven approaches to the problem of sexual assault.”

SAVE has developed a bill that would require that campus sexual assault cases be handled by local law enforcement authorities, not untrained campus disciplinary panels: http://www.saveservices.org/camp/campus-rape-courts/

Stop Abusive and Violent Environments is working to promote effective solutions to campus sexual assault: http://www.saveservices.org/

Categories
Campus Sexual Assault

PR: Harvard Law Professors Rail Against New Sex Policy

Contact: Gina Lauterio

Telephone: 301-801-0608

Email: glauterio@saveservices.org

Harvard Law Professors Rail Against New Sex Policy

WASHINGTON / October 16, 2014 – Twenty-eight faculty members at the Harvard Law School have issued a statement criticizing the university’s new Sexual Harassment Policy. The strongly worded statement, unprecedented in its challenge to U.S. Department of Education policy, was published in the October 15 edition of the Boston Globehttp://www.bostonglobe.com/opinion/2014/10/14/rethink-harvard-sexual-harassment-policy/HFDDiZN7nU2UwuUuWMnqbM/story.html

The document expressed the law professors’ “strong objections” to the Harvard policy which is “inconsistent with many of the most basic principles we teach” and which, they warned, “will do more harm than good.”

The professors noted the university’s new definition of sexual harassment “goes significantly beyond Title IX and Title VII law.” They charged the new procedures are “overwhelmingly stacked against the accused” because they “lack the most basic elements of fairness and due process.”

The declaration recited the following particulars:

■ The policy’s “absence of any adequate opportunity to discover the facts charged and to confront witnesses and present a defense at an adversary hearing.”

■ “The lodging of the functions of investigation, prosecution, fact-finding, and appellate review in one office.”

■ A “failure to ensure adequate representation for the accused, particularly for students unable to afford representation.”

The Harvard faculty enjoined university administrators to “withdraw this sexual harassment policy” and develop new “substantive and procedural rules which would best balance the complex issues involved.”

“The Harvard faculty has rung the bell of liberty in defense of our fundamental civil rights,” notes SAVE spokesperson Sheryle Hutter. “Professors at other law schools around the country will hopefully issue similar declarations about the Department of Education’s ham-fisted and unconstitutional policies.”

Numerous commentators have criticized the Department of Education’s 2011 Dear Colleague Letter on sexual assault because it shortchanges both victims and the accused: www.accusingu.org

Stop Abusive and Violent Environments—SAVE—works for evidence-based solutions to sexual assault: www.saveservices.org

Categories
Accusing U. Affirmative Consent Campus Press Release Rape-Culture Hysteria Sexual Assault Sexual Harassment

Campus Anti-Rape Efforts Go Silly

Stop Abusive and Violent Environments
October 7, 2014

Three percent of women are victims of rape during their college years. And that number appears to be declining. But that hasn’t stopped campus activists from declaring that a sexual assault “epidemic” is sweeping our campuses and advocating for rape prevention programs that are downright silly, if not absurd.

These are 5 recent examples around the country:

1. Crazy-Making at Michigan
The new University of Michigan policy provides several examples of sexual violence. One type of “violence” listed in its policy is “withholding sex and affection.”

That’s right, U of M no longer believes that “no means no.” Columnist Susan Kruth recently wrote: “This is utterly unconscionable, and, frankly, insane. It is the absolute last message we should be sending to college students.”

2. Taco Runs at ASU
Arizona State University has come up with a novel solution to rape: having by-standers suggest that intoxicated men go out and grab some tacos.

If that doesn’t work, an intoxicated male should be persuaded that the girl he is talking to is “ugly” and “not worth sleeping with,” according to the student group Always Get Consent.

3. Whistles for Rapists
At the University of Colorado, campus activists claim that encouraging women to take common-sense protective measures like carrying a rape whistle constitutes “blaming the victim.”

So the Student Health Center is now distributing flyers to men instructing them that the “only use for a rape whistle is: If you are about to rape someone, warn them. Blow the whistle.”

4. Big Sister at Clemson
At Clemson University in South Carolina, students were required to complete a survey asking detailed questions such as:
• “How many times have you had sex (including oral) in the last 3 months?”
• “With how many different people have you had sex (including oral) in the last 3 months?”

Failure to complete the questionnaire was deemed to be a violation of the Student Code of Conduct and subject to disciplinary action.

5. Sex Week in New Mexico
Last week the University of New Mexico Women’s Resource Center co-sponsored Sex Week. The week included lectures on topics such as “How to be a Gentleman AND Get Laid,” “Reid’s Negotiating Successful Threesomes,” and “O-Face Oral.”

According to the media account, “The events are designed to prevent sexual assault, but organizers have taken a new approach…Instead of teaching students how not to get hurt, they’re teaching them how to have safer and better sex.”
We’re hoping the event organizers will explain how escalating the already hyper-sexualized environment of college campuses will serve to deter sexual assault.

Time to Get Serious About Rape

Let’s state the obvious: Rape is a crime.

Stopping rape requires improved police reporting, professional investigations, and vigorous prosecutions.

Rape cases should be handled by the criminal justice system, not by ill-equipped campus Kangaroo Courts.