Categories
Bills Campus Civil Rights Department of Education Due Process False Allegations Office for Civil Rights Press Release Sexual Assault Sexual Harassment Title IX

Ignoring Wave of Attacks on Campus Due Process, Lawmakers Introduce Bill to Help ‘Survivors.’

PRESS RELEASE

Rebecca Hain: 513-479-3335

Email: info@saveservices.org

Ignoring Wave of Attacks on Campus Due Process, Lawmakers Introduce Bill to Help ‘Survivors,’ For the Fifth Time

WASHINGTON / October 10, 2022 – Basic principles of “due process” on campus are being challenged by a growing number of frivolous and false Title IX complaints. Despite these developments, Congressional lawmakers introduced last week the Campus Accountability and Safety Act, a bill that does nothing to shore up due process protections.

Due process, enshrined in the Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution, serves to protect innocent citizens from false accusations. But a review of recent Title IX complaints reveals that female students increasingly are resorting to Title IX as a weapon to settle old scores.

For example, Clemson University student Erin Wingo initiated a sexual encounter with a male acquaintance. But worried that her boyfriend might learn of the tryst, Wingo fabricated an allegation of sexual assault. A South Carolina jury later awarded the male student $5.3 million for defamation (1).

In another case, the male student was taking a medication that precluded his ability to have intercourse— but that did not deter an accusation of “rape” from being filed by the female student. In other recent complaints, there is no allegation of intimate sexual contact. Rather, the complaint centers around vague and unverifiable claims of “harassment.”

In addition, recent developments reveal that certain groups are seeking to roll back fundamental due process protections:

  1. The Department of Education released a draft Title IX regulation in June that was widely criticized for its removal of key due process protections. One letter from 19 state Attorneys General charged, “The Proposed Rule threatens to destroy Title IX.” (2)
  2. The presumption of innocence has long been seen as the bedrock to due process (3). Nonetheless, 12 Democratic Senators submitted a letter calling on the Department of Education to remove any ”presumption that the respondent is not responsible for sex discrimination until a determination is made.” (4) This extreme position provoked the ire of leading liberal commentators (5).

Ignoring these worrisome threats to due process, last week federal lawmakers introduced the Campus Accountability and Safety Act (6). The bill had been introduced, unsuccessfully, in four previous sessions of Congress (7).

The House bill was co-sponsored by Representatives Carolyn Maloney and John Katko, neither of whom will be serving in Congress next year. Announced five weeks before the highly contested November 8 elections, the bill has little chance of being passed into law in the current session of Congress.

“The truth is that there is no crisis in sexual assault on campus,” notes a leading Title IX attorney. “Title IX teaches women to blame the guy instead of accepting her share of responsibility for the failed relationship.”

Citations:

  1. https://www.saveservices.org/2022/04/south-carolina-jury-awards-5-3-million-to-wrongfully-accused-clemson-u-student-on-defamation-and-civil-conspiracy-claims/
  2. https://www.texasattorneygeneral.gov/sites/default/files/images/executive-management/Title%20IX%20NPRM%20Indiana%20Comment%20Letter%20FINAL.pdf
  3. http://www.prosecutorintegrity.org/innocence/cornerstone/
  4. https://www.help.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/220912%20Title%20IX%20Comment%20Letter.pdf
  5. https://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2022/09/24/senate_democrats_and_title_ix_148234.html
  6. https://maloney.house.gov/sites/maloney.house.gov/files/final%20casa.pdf
  7. https://www.grassley.senate.gov/news/news-releases/grassley-gillibrand-reintroduce-bipartisan-bill-to-combat-sexual-assault-on-college-campuses
Categories
Title IX

Resolution to Reject Harmful, Coercive, and Burdensome Gender Identity Policies and Protect School Lunch Programs and Federal Funding Subject to Title IX

Resolution to Support Parents, Schools, and Districts in Rejecting Harmful, Coercive, and Burdensome Gender Identity Policies and Protect School Lunch Programs and Federal Funding Subject to Title IX

By Christin Bentley, SD1 Committeewoman

WHEREAS, Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972 was enacted into law to ensure that “No person in the United States shall, on the basis of sex, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination under any education program or activity receiving Federal financial assistance”; and

WHEREAS, original and existing Title IX regulations acknowledge “physiological differences between the male and female sexes”; and

WHEREAS, on June 23, 2022, the U.S. Department of Education (USDOE) released proposed changes to Title IX regulations that would contradict the plain language of the law; and

WHEREAS, the proposed regulations would prohibit schools that receive federal funds, including public, charter, private, and parochial schools, from “adopting a policy or engaging in a practice that prevents a person from participating in an education program or activity consistent with their gender identity,” thereby compelling schools to deny biological reality; and

WHEREAS, under the proposed rules, actions such as a student or staff member using a child’s legal name and biological pronouns rather than the child-selected preferred name and pronouns could be deemed a form of “sex-based harassment,” subjecting schools and staff to civil litigation and loss of federal funds; and

WHEREAS, the proposed regulations would require that K-12 schools socially transition minor children to a different gender without requiring parental notification or involvement; and

WHEREAS, Texas law and the United State’s Constitution and legal precedent recognize the right of parents to direct the education, upbringing, and physical and mental health of their children; and

WHEREAS, under the proposed rules, schools would be required to grant access to sex-separate restroom and locker room facilities based on gender identity rather than on biological sex, which would place girls and women at increased risk for harassment and sexual assault by males who claim a female identity; and

WHEREAS, the USDOE proposed regulations pertaining to athletics would require sports teams to be based on gender identity rather than biological sex, forcing women and girls to compete on an unfair basis against males for athletic opportunities and scholarships; and

WHEREAS, Governor Greg Abbott signed into law the Save Women’s Sport’s Bill (H.B. 25) that says the athlete’s sex assigned at birth determines if a student plays in girls’ or boys’ sports in high school; and

WHEREAS, in guidance issued May 5, 2022 and in a rule promulgated on June 14, 2022, the U.S. Department of Agriculture announced that it will interpret the prohibition on sex discrimination found in Title IX and the Food and Nutrition Act of 2008 to include discrimination based on gender identity; and

WHEREAS, Texas public schools, nonprofit private schools, and residential childcare institutions could now be forced to choose between adopting gender identity policies or foregoing federal funding to provide subsidized free or reduced-price; now

THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Republican Party of Texas declares its unequivocal opposition to the proposed regulatory changes released by the U.S. Department of Education on June 23, 2022; and

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Republican Party of Texas supports the lawsuit filed by Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton and 21 other state Attorneys General seeking to invalidate the newly enacted Department of Agriculture rules that tie continued receipt of federal nutritional assistance and other funding subject to Title IX to the adoption of gender identity policies; and

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Executive Committee of the Republican Party of Texas directs the Chairman to issue a press release notifying the public, media and Texas Congressional members of this resolution upon its passage.

NOTE: This Resolution was unanimously approved by the Texas State Republican Executive Committee on Saturday, Sept. 24, 2022.

Categories
Campus Civil Rights Department of Education Due Process Free Speech Office for Civil Rights Press Release Sexual Assault Sexual Harassment Title IX

Attorneys General School the DOE on Meaning of ‘Free Speech,’ ‘Due Process,’ and ‘Constitutional Rights’

PRESS RELEASE

Rebecca Stewart: 513-479-3335

Email: info@saveservices.org

Attorneys General School the DOE on Meaning of ‘Free Speech,’ ‘Due Process,’ and ‘Constitutional Rights’

WASHINGTON / September 19, 2022 – The Attorneys General from 18 states have submitted comments to the U.S. Department of Education (DOE), in response to a proposed Title IX regulation that has stimulated widespread debate and opposition (1). The Attorneys’ General comments represent a tutorial on the meaning and application of First and Fourteenth Amendment guarantees in the higher education setting.

  1. The first letter, signed by the Attorneys General of MT, AL, AR, GA, IN, KS, KY, LA, MS, NE, OK, SC, SD, TN, TX, UT, and VA, first analyzes the DOE proposal to vastly expand the definition of sexual harassment. This change would “chill the free exchange of ideas,” which would “intimidate students and faculty into keeping quiet on controversial issues.” (2)

The letter then deplores the rule’s plan to remove or modify important due process safeguards, including advance disclosure of evidence, impartial investigations, key written notice provisions, and live hearings. Cumulatively, these changes are “reminiscent of Star Chambers” that “stacked the deck against accused students.” The 37-page letter concludes, “In many instances, moreover, the Department’s Proposed Rule conflicts with the text, purpose, and longstanding interpretation of Title IX.”

  1. The second letter charges the draft regulation lacks a clear statement of authority from Congress, and highlights the proposed rule’s unlawful attempt to preempt state laws that protect the rights of females. Signed by the Attorneys General of IN, AL, AZ, AR, GA, KS, KY, LA, MS, MT, NE, OK, SC, SD, TN, TX, UT, VA, and WV, the letter concludes simply, “The Proposed Rule threatens to destroy Title IX.” (3)
  2. Attorney General Ken Paxton of Texas flatly charges the Biden proposal will “destroy constitutional rights.” (4) AG Paxton’s letter to the DOE concludes tartly, “the Proposed Rule promises to repeat the mistakes of the Department’s ill-advised 2011 Dear Colleague Letter.” (5)

All three letters sharply criticize the DOE plan to expand the definition of “sex” to include “gender identity.” Noting that the draft policy lacks definitions of “sex” or “gender identity,” the first letter notes that the Department of Education “simply waves its hand and—by regulatory fiat—alters a fundamental term, as if its novel definition was axiomatic.” (2)

The first letter also highlights the role of Catherine Lhamon, who served as the DOE Assistant Secretary for Civil Rights from 2013 to 2017, and was re-appointed to the same position in 2021. During the earlier period, the letter notes that Lhamon played the lead role in creating a “constitutional and regulatory mess.”

Citations:

  1. https://www.saveservices.org/2022-policy/
  2. https://www.texasattorneygeneral.gov/sites/default/files/images/executive-management/Montana%20Coalition%20Title%20IX%20Comment%20FINAL%209.12.22.pdf
  3. https://www.texasattorneygeneral.gov/sites/default/files/images/executive-management/Title%20IX%20NPRM%20Indiana%20Comment%20Letter%20FINAL.pdf
  4. https://www.texasattorneygeneral.gov/news/releases/paxton-slams-biden-administration-its-radical-attempt-redefine-biology-destroy-constitutional-rights
  5. https://www.texasattorneygeneral.gov/sites/default/files/images/executive-management/20220912%20Paxton%20Title%20IX%20Comment.pdf
Categories
Campus Due Process Free Speech Office for Civil Rights Press Release Sexual Harassment Title IX

Title IX Network Groups Lead Effort to Bombard DOE with Over 240,000 Title IX Comments

PRESS RELEASE

Rebecca Stewart: 513-479-3335

Email: info@saveservices.org

Title IX Network Groups Lead Effort to Bombard DOE with Over 240,000 Title IX Comments

WASHINGTON / September 15, 2022 – The Department of Education proposed a new Title IX regulation on June 23 that provoked widespread debate. In response, 240,085 public comments about the controversial policy were filed with the DOE before its September 12 deadline (1). Many of these comments were filed as a result of the efforts of over 160 groups that participate in the Title IX Network (2).

Following are examples of the outreach activities of several Title IX Network members to promote the submission of comments:

  • The Family Policy Alliance drafted a comment (3) and encouraged the submission of 13,000 comments by the members of its network.
  • The Texas Eagle Forum (4) sent an action alert to its subscribers/members, providing links to the SAVE website, including research links and submission instructions (5).
  • Speech First sent multiple emails to its email list of 110,000 members directing them to the comment submission pages of SAVE and the Defense of Freedom Institute (6), as well as to Speech First’s website (7).
  • United Families International created a dedicated webpage, including talking points, tips for effective writing of comments, instructions, and the link to the government portal, and sent several Action Alerts and reminders (8).
  • Katartismos Global sent information to the Anglican Church in North America, American Association of Evangelicals, and a national prayer initiative called the World Prayer Network (9).

SAVE submitted nine separate comments, including a listing of the organizations opposed to the draft regulation (10), the names of 235 religious leaders opposed to the Title IX policy (11), and an analysis of 175 judicial decisions in favor of campus due process (12).

The proposed Title IX regulation negates basic free speech and due process provisions of the Constitution, ignores the milestone Davis v. Monroe Supreme Court decision, subverts Congressional intent, and inexplicably contradicts the fundamental purpose of Title IX, which is to curb sex discrimination in schools.

SAVE calls on the Department of Education to promptly withdraw its ill-considered Title IX regulation.

Citations:

  1. https://www.regulations.gov/document/ED-2021-OCR-0166-0001
  2. https://www.saveservices.org/2022-Policy/
  3. https://familypolicyalliance.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/09/Title-IX-Proposed-Rule-Comment-FINAL.pdf
  4. https://www.texaseagleforum.com/
  5. https://www.saveservices.org/2022-Policy/Comments/
  6. https://protecttitle9.org/
  7. speechfirst.org
  8. https://www.unitedfamilies.org/?sfw=pass1663183551
  9. kgiglobal.org
  10. https://www.saveservices.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/Comment-to-DOE-Title-IX-Network.pdf
  11. https://www.saveservices.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/09/Comment-to-DOE-Religious-Leaders-9.6.22.pdf
  12. https://www.saveservices.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/Comment-to-DOE-Analysis-of-175-Decisions.pdf
Categories
Campus Due Process False Allegations Sexual Assault Sexual Harassment Title IX

Falsely Accused Day Spotlights Growing Exasperation of Judges and Juries with Pernicious Problem that Affects 20 Million

PRESS RELEASE

Rebecca Stewart: 513-479-3335

Email: info@endtodv.org

Falsely Accused Day Spotlights Growing Exasperation of Judges and Juries with Pernicious Problem that Affects 20 Million

WASHINGTON / August 29, 2022 – This past week, First Circuit Court Judge Bruce Selya issued a milestone ruling in a case involving an MIT student accused of nonconsensual sexual behavior (1). The opinion will allow accused students who contend the accusation is false to file a lawsuit using a pseudonym. Being publicly viewed as a “sex offender” can represent an impediment to such students claiming the university failed to uphold due process protections.

The decision represents the latest in a string of victories by accused students who initiate legal action against their former schools. Over the past decade, judges have ruled in favor of the accused student in 238 cases (2). Many of these cases have been compiled and summarized in the SAVE publication, “Analysis of Judicial Decisions Affirming the 2020 Title IX Regulation” (3).

In South Carolina, student Erin Wingo claimed she was a victim of non-consensual sexual assault. Wingo filed a complaint with the Clemson University Title IX office, resulting in the suspension of the alleged “rapist” from the school. After the suspension was finalized, Wingo’s boyfriend sent the accused student this revelatory text message: “You’re innocent. I lied in that hearing. Erin wanted to have sex that night.” The accused man then filed a defamation lawsuit against Wingo. On March 25, 2022, the jury announced a stunning $5.3 million award against the woman (4).

More recently, a Virginia jury awarded $15 million to actor Johnny Depp for defamatory claims of domestic violence made by Amber Heard in a Washington Post editorial (5).

The high dollar value of the South Carolina and Virginia awards reflects a growing public impatience with the widespread problem of false allegations. A 2020 national survey found that 8% of Americans — 11% of men and 6% of women — report being falsely accused of sexual assault, domestic violence, or child abuse. The 8% figure represents 20.4 million adults (6).

False allegations can have a range of serious consequences including loss of family relationships, social stigmatization, impairment of career opportunities, and mental health problems (7). In response, New York (8), Iowa (9), and California (10) have enacted laws designed to sanction false accusers.

Falsely Accused Day will be observed on Friday, September 9. Falsely Accused Day will be marked by events held in the United States (11) and in other countries around the world (12).

Citations:

  1. https://blog.simplejustice.us/2022/08/25/first-circuit-upholds-student-anonymity-in-title-ix-challenge/
  2. https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1CsFhy86oxh26SgTkTq9GV_BBrv5NAA5z9cv178Fjk3o/edit#gid=0
  3. https://www.saveservices.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/Analysis-of-Title-IX-Regulation-3.24.2022.pdf
  4. https://www.saveservices.org/2022/04/south-carolina-jury-awards-5-3-million-to-wrongfully-accused-clemson-u-student-on-defamation-and-civil-conspiracy-claims/
  5. https://www.cbsnews.com/live-updates/johnny-depp-verdict-amber-heard-lawsuit-defamation-damages/
  6. http://www.prosecutorintegrity.org/pr/survey-over-20-million-have-been-falsely-accused-of-abuse/
  7. https://factuk.org/the-suffering-of-the-wrongfully-accused/
  8. https://www.nysenate.gov/legislation/bills/2019/s8492
  9. https://openstates.org/ia/bills/2021-2022/HF821/
  10. https://calstate.policystat.com/policy/8453518/latest/
  11. https://www.dosomethingforourmen.com/
  12. https://falselyaccusedday.org/
Categories
Campus Free Speech Gender Identity Sexual Assault Sexual Harassment Title IX

Flawed Biden Proposal May Irreparably Harm Title IX. Lawmakers Are Urged to File Comments.

PRESS RELEASE

Rebecca Stewart: 513-479-3335

Email: info@saveservices.org

Flawed Biden Proposal May Irreparably Harm Title IX. Lawmakers Are Urged to File Comments.

WASHINGTON / August 22, 2022 – The Biden Title IX proposal is attracting a growing wave of criticism by lawmakers, attorneys general, 150 organizations, and editorialists (1). The criticisms underscore a concern that the Department of Education proposal is so deeply flawed that it is discrediting the nation’s broader effort to end sex discrimination. SAVE invites lawmakers around the nation to file Comments urging that the Department of Education withdraw its ill-considered proposal.

The federal Title IX law states, “No person in the United States shall, on the basis of sex, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination under any education program or activity receiving Federal financial assistance.”

But the Biden draft Title IX regulation, released on June 23, ignores the plain language and clear intent of the Title IX law, which is designed to curb sex discrimination against males and females.

By means of 175 lawsuit decisions, federal judges have delineated a series of due process protections to protect male students from false allegations (2). In a recent editorial, Rick Manning, president of Americans for Limited Government, accused the Department of Education of promoting “guilty without remorse regulations” in which the “concept of justice in America is turned on its head.” (3)

Equally strong criticisms have been leveled by advocates for women’s rights. The Independent Women’s Voice, for example, charges the Biden proposal will “subvert” the rights of parents and “destroy” the purpose of Title IX (4).

The Biden Title IX plan proposes to alter the definition of “sex” to include “gender identity.” This signifies a repudiation of congressional intent, which never contemplated such a change.

The proposed “gender identity” language would provide a formidable legal foundation to the “gender identity movement” (5). Recent articles have documented how the gender identity movement has established a presence in schools across the nation:

  • Nationwide, the GSA Network serves as an umbrella organization for more than 4,000 “gender and sexuality alliances” in 40 states. The organization recommends that school advisors not advise parents about their child’s participation in such clubs (6).
  • In California, the Sacramento City Unified School District has adopted a “queer theory–based pedagogy that encourages teachers to ‘normalize gender exploration,’ confront their ‘cisgender privilege,’ and maintain strict secrecy when facilitating a child’s gender or sexual transition.” (7)
  • In Oregon, the Portland public schools have launched a new curriculum that teaches students to ”begin exploring ‘the infinite gender spectrum.’” (8)

Under the Biden plan, questioning such initiatives would constitute sex discrimination and therefore be illegal. This would violate First Amendment free speech guarantees (9).

Lawmakers are called upon to submit Comments to the Department of Education, urging the DOE to abandon its deeply flawed proposal. Step-by-step instructions to submit Comments are available online (10).

The deadline to submit Comments is September 12.

Citations:

  1. https://www.saveservices.org/2022-policy/
  2. https://www.saveservices.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/Analysis-of-Title-IX-Regulation-3.24.2022.pdf
  3. https://dailytorch.com/2022/08/bidens-education-department-seeks-to-end-due-process-under-title-ix-for-college-students/
  4. https://www.iwv.org/campaign/save-our-schools-take-back-title-ix/
  5. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF01550366
  6. https://www.city-journal.org/gsa-clubs-smuggle-gender-ideology-into-k-12-education
  7. https://www.city-journal.org/how-gender-radicalism-conquered-sacramento-schools
  8. https://www.city-journal.org/in-portland-the-sexual-revolution-starts-in-kindergarten
  9. https://www.theamericanconservative.com/articles/biden-and-universities-launch-sneak-attack-on-free-speech/
  10. https://www.saveservices.org/2022-Policy/Comments/
Categories
Campus Department of Education Due Process Office for Civil Rights Sexual Assault Sexual Harassment Title IX

Relentless Pressure on Colleges and Universities to End Campus ‘Kangaroo Courts’

PRESS RELEASE

Rebecca Stewart: 513-479-3335

Email: info@saveservices.org

Relentless Pressure on Colleges and Universities to End Campus ‘Kangaroo Courts’

WASHINGTON / August 18, 2022 – As the new academic year approaches, SAVE is urging school administrators to exercise greater oversight over their Title IX offices to bring an end to the notorious “Kangaroo Courts.” Several developments during the Summer months highlight the growing pressures on institutions to assure fairness in Title IX proceedings:

Judicial Deference: On June 2, Second Circuit Appellate Judge Jose Cabranes issued a concurrence that compared campus disciplinary committees to the infamous English Star Chambers and warned, “[T]hese threats to due process and academic freedom are matters of life and death for our great universities.” (1) The continued wave of Title IX lawsuits has eroded the long-standing notion of judicial deference to institutions of higher education.

State Legislation: On June 15, Louisiana Governor John Edwards signed the “Student Due Process and Protection Act” into law (2). The campus bill had been approved in both the House and the Senate without a single opposing vote. To date, 11 states have enacted legislation that mandate campus due process protections (3).

Presumption of Innocence: A national survey conducted in June for SAVE by YouGov found that 87% of respondents support a presumption of innocence for college disciplinary hearings (4).

Lawsuit: On July 20, Judge CJ Williams of the District Court of Northern Iowa handed down a decision against Fordt University that documented widespread procedural irregularities (5). The decision was one of the most sweeping Title IX rulings issued in the past decade.

DC Rally: An August 11 rally held in Washington, DC featured several presentations on the need for greater attention to campus fairness (6). Teresa Manning of the National Association of Scholars highlighted how campus due process rights “protect the lone individual up against powerful institutions like government and schools.” (7)

Student Enrollments: The National Student Clearinghouse Research Center reports that “postsecondary institutions have lost nearly 1.3 million students since spring 2020.” (8) Negative media coverage of unconstitutional Title IX procedures is likely to worsen the problem of declining student enrollments, especially among male students.

This past week in Ithaca, New York, a person dressed as a kangaroo made an appearance on the campus of Cornell University. Sponsored by the New Civil Liberties Alliance, the kangaroo charged, “If you have a Title IX sexual misconduct complaint filed against you, chances are you will not get a fair hearing.” (9)

SAVE’s “Analysis of Judicial Decisions Affirming the 2020 Title IX Regulation” summarizes 175 Title IX decisions favorable to the accused student (10).

Citations:

  1. https://nclalegal.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/06/20-1514_complete_opn.pdf
  2. https://legiscan.com/LA/bill/HB364/2022
  3. https://www.saveservices.org/title-ix-regulation/state-laws/
  4. https://www.saveservices.org/2022/06/63-of-americans-oppose-expanding-definition-of-sex-to-include-gender-identity/
  5. https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.iand.56248/gov.uscourts.iand.56248.72.0.pdf
  6. https://www.saveservices.org/2022-policy/rally/
  7. https://www.saveservices.org/2022/08/biden-title-ix-take-over-threatens-due-process-the-most-fundamental-legal-right/
  8. https://nscresearchcenter.org/current-term-enrollment-estimates/
  9. https://www.facebook.com/NewCivilLibertiesAlliance/posts/pfbid0UeK6mHrsqrbTCNkjaFHnxSdXfXAxizoNt5bDgUivEm3itYsGnvuj3WQjM8AWM5eNl
  10. https://www.saveservices.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/Analysis-of-Title-IX-Regulation-3.24.2022.pdf
Categories
Title IX

Parental Rights Must Reign

Parental Rights Must Reign

Cindi Castilla

As President of Texas Eagle Forum, I often get phone calls from parents seeking help. Their child as young as 7 has come home from school and asked if he is gay or if she is a lesbian because they love their best friends. We clearly already have teachers who are happy steal our role as parent and to expose young children to a doctrine that destroys. Kids are confused and parents want to know how to protect them from this insane gender agenda.

Unfortunately, our government is not here to help! The U.S. Department of Education has proposed new Title IX rules that will destroy parental rights in America. The Biden administration and DOE have unconstitutionally added the word GENDER to our laws in an attempt to force unscientific gender propaganda on our nation’s students.

It is quite disconcerting that the word “sex” or “sexual” is in the proposed rulemaking document 2985 times! “Regulation” shows up 1301 times. “Sexual orientation” 77 times, and “Gender identity” 112. Our government is creating a problem by exposing children to gender and sexual propaganda at a young age, and then forcing the public schools to follow 701 pages of new regulations in education, regulations which strip away our parental rights.

U.S. public education was originally intended to help a child reach his full potential and become a responsible citizen who loves his country.

Education was not given the right to indoctrinate our children with social and harmful ideologies.  As education continues to promote a social agenda instead of teaching factual knowledge, taxpayers and parents have watched the decline in U.S. educational outcomes.

One of many egregious acts of the proposed rules is to force schools to promote anti-Christian ideas about sex and gender to children of every age. Most young children do not think about sexuality and gender. They just don’t. Flinging these adult ideas on trusting children is harmful and destructive to young minds. Parents have a right to protect their children from these concepts – and only they decide when their child is ready for this information.

Until very recently, gender-confusion was considered a mental health issue and parents were advised to practice watchful waiting. Almost all gender-confused children embraced their birth sex as they got older. Those who were struggling because of abuse were able to get healing help.

Under the proposed rules, we can ask no questions. Free speech is muzzled when parents and children cannot express their own truth and are forced to acquiesce to another’s. The government will require everyone to agree that gender-confusion is perfectly normal and their destructive solutions are good. Truly, the emperor has no clothes!

When our government forces a child to use another child’s self-declared pronouns, they are clearly acting hostile to religion, which has been declared unconstitutional by the Supreme Court in Kennedy v Bremerton. Christians and other Americans know God created men and women uniquely, with unchangeable XX or XY chromosomes, yet our government wants to force our children to believe in their religion of gender theology. This is the establishment of religion in our schools, and parents and our beloved Constitution are having none of that!

Another reason we must be alarmed is the idea that a child can be counseled without parental permission, to choose their gender.

To President Biden and the Department of Education we say:

“You may NOT indoctrinate our children in gender theology. You may NOT sexualize our children, You may NOT provide healthcare without our express permission. You many NOT collect our kids personal data, You may NOT invade our children’s privacy in bathrooms and locker rooms. You may NOT change the English language to accept ridiculous pronouns. You may NOT promote unhealthy behavior in our schools.”

“We DO give you permission to teach our children to read, to write, to do math, to study scientific ideas and to learn from real history. You MUST equip them to launch into adulthood with the ability to think for themselves and become productive citizens.”

If the Department of Education is seeking to destroy public education and increase the mass exodus from the institution, they are on the right track. If their goal is to truly educate our children, they MUST listen to parents and abandon this Title IX re-write, which has nothing to offer actual education.

Note: This presentation was given as the August 11 Stop the Title IX Take-Over rally in Washington, DC.

 

Categories
Department of Education Office for Civil Rights Sexual Assault Sexual Harassment Title IX

DC Rally Reveals Deceptive and Coercive Agenda Behind Biden Title IX Plan

PRESS RELEASE

Rebecca Stewart: 513-479-3335

Email: info@saveservices.org

DC Rally Reveals Deceptive and Coercive Agenda Behind Biden Title IX Plan

WASHINGTON / August 15, 2022 – A rally held in Washington, DC on August 11 featured impassioned calls for the Department of Education to abandon plans to move ahead with its proposed Title IX regulation. The rally addressed six major concerns with the draft Title IX policy that was released on June 23: Due process, free speech, women’s sports, parental rights, bathroom privacy, and gender transitioning (1).

Although the draft policy is titled, “Nondiscrimination on the Basis of Sex in Education Programs,” in reality the policy would worsen sex discrimination against two groups: Males falsely accused of sexual misconduct (2), and biological females involved in sports activities (3).

Many of the rally presenters highlighted the coercive and controlling nature of current gender-identity policies, which would be expanded and strengthened by the proposed regulation:

Due Process: Teresa Manning of the National Association of Scholars charged that Biden’s proposed rule “would return to the bad old days of the ‘single investigator’ INQUISITION, where one school official holds ‘individual meetings’ to decide guilt or innocence.”

Free Speech: Stuart Taylor of Princetonians for Free Speech quoted one observer who believes the proposed Biden rule “could officially destroy a life by expulsion from college on the basis of being inadequately woke that one’s utterance offends someone.”

Women’s Sports: Sarah Parshall Perry of the Heritage Foundation warned the Biden administration’s proposal will fundamentally harm female sports and “eviscerates everything our mothers and grandmothers worked to achieve.”

Parental Rights: Ryan Bomberger of The Radiance Foundation noted that parents “can be harassed by school administrations because you’re speaking biological truths….that’s a problem.”

Bathroom Privacy: Referring to threats of the USDA to withhold school lunch funds for non-compliance with transgender bathroom policies, Maya Noronha of the First Liberty Institute compared government officials to “school-yard bullies” who are ”threatening to defund schools.”

Gender Transitioning: Jon Schweppe of the American Principles Project revealed, “You put [students] on these puberty blockers, you put them on these cross-sex hormones, it’s permanent.”

Edward Bartlett of SAVE summarized these concerns by noting that Biden’s gender identity experiment “is not a good-faith attempt to achieve acceptance and affirmation. It is really an agenda of coercion, conformity, and control.”

The newly established Title IX Network will seek to counter the harmful effects of flawed Title IX policies at the national, state, and local levels (4). More information about the August 11 rally is available online (5).

Citations:

  1. https://www.saveservices.org/camp/weaponization/
  2. https://www.saveservices.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/Analysis-of-Title-IX-Regulation-3.24.2022.pdf
  3. https://www.iwf.org/title-ix-resource-center/
  4. https://www.saveservices.org/2022-policy/network/
  5. https://www.saveservices.org/2022-policy/rally/
Categories
Title IX

Do Children Deserve the Right to Privacy in School Locker Rooms, Bathrooms, and School Showers?

DO CHILDREN DESERVE THE RIGHT TO PRIVACY IN SCHOOL LOCKER ROOMS, BATHROOMS, AND SCHOOL SHOWERS?

STATEMENT BY 60 PLUS ASSOCIATION
FOUNDER/CHAIRMAN JIM MARTIN

STOP THE WORLD! I WANT TO GET OFF!

1962, 60 YEARS AGO, WHEN I CAME TO WASHINGTON AS
A NEWSPAPER REPORTER, JACK KENNEDY WAS IN THE
WHITE HOUSE, NEAL ARMSTRONG HAD NOT YET WALKED
ON THE MOON, STROM THURMOND WAS STILL A
DEMOCRAT, AND TITLE 9, LEVELNG THE ATHLETIC
PLAYING FIELD FOR YOUNG FEMALES, WAS 10 YEARS IN
THE FUTURE—–SO I’VE WITNESSED A LOT OF HISTORY,
SO MUCH HISTORY THAT FOR TODAY’S EVENT, I SAY STOP
THE WORLD! I WANT TO GET OFF! THAT WAS THE NAME
OF A POPULAR MOVIE IN THE 60s TO ESCAPE THE CHAOS
BACK THEN. IT CLEARLY DESCRIBES TODAY’S WORLD,
THIS RADICAL EXPERIMENT IN GENDER ENGINEERING,
EPITOMIZED BY THE PROFESSOR WHO DECLARED THAT
MEN CAN GET PREGNANT. YOU KNOW, YOU CAN’T FIX STUPID. AND TO BE PERFECTLY CLEAR WHERE I STAND
REGARDING THIS GENDER ENGINEERING, I MAKE
REFERENCE TO ONE OF OUR FOUNDING FATHERS, JOHN
ADAMS, WHO SUPPOSEDLY ONCE SAID DURING DEBATE,
“FACTS ARE STUBBOREN THINGS.”

WELL, I STRONGLY CONTEND THAT THE FACTS
PERTAINING TO THIS RADICAL GENDER EXPERIMENT

I SAY THIS ON BEHALF OF MY TWO DAUGHTERS, NINE
GRAND DAUGHTERS AND OVERALL MY 7 CHILDREN, 19
GRAND CHILDREN AND FOUR GREAT GRAND CHILDREN! I COULD NOW ENHANCE MY REMARKS BY QUOTING
SEVERAL ATHLETES BUT I’LL ONLY QUOTE ONE WHO
STARRED IN MY HOME STATE AT THE UNIVERSITY OF
KENTUCKY, RILEY GAINES, WHO POINTEDLY SAID HER
BIGGEST DISAPPOINTMENT, BY FAR, WAS NOT IN RACING
LIA THOMAS BUT IN HAVING TO SHARE BATHROOM AND
SHOWER FACILITIES. SHE AND OTHERS, SHE LAMENTED,
WERE “‘EXTREMELY UNCOMFORTABLE, NOT ONLY
ARE YOU FORCED TO RACE AGAINST A MALE, YOU’RE
FORCED TO CHANGE IN THE LOCKER ROOM WITH ONE.”

ARE
THAT THERE ARE ONLY TWO SEXES, FEMALE AND MALE,
AND WHICHEVER SEX YOUR BIRTH CERTIFICATE
IDENTIFIES YOU, IS HOW WE STRONGLY CONTEND IS THE
SEX YOU SHOULD BE IDENTIFIED BY AS YOU ENTER
ADULTHOOD. NOW TO MY TOPIC: DO CHILDREN DESERVE
THE RIGHT TO PRIVACY IN SCHOOL LOCKER ROOMS,
BATHROOMS AND SCHOOL SHOWERS? YOU BET THEY DO!

I TURN NOW TO BRUCE JENNER WHO SET A NEW WORLD
RECORD AT THE 1976 OLYMPICS IN THE 10-EVENT
DECATHLON, THE MOST GRUELING OF ALL ATHLETIC
ENDEAVORS. JENNER WAS BESTOWED THE TITLE
‘WORLD’S GREATEST ATHLETE.’ I ADMIRED BRUCE
JENNER THEN AND ADMIRE HIM NOW AS CAITLYN JENNER.

I ALSO ADMIRE LIA THOMAS FOR TRANSITIONING, AS
JENNER DID, FROM AS THEY SAY, BEING TRAPPED IN THE
BODY OF THE WRONG SEX.
BUT I DON’T ADMIRE LIA WHO, AFTER SWIMMING FOR
THREE YEARS ON THE MEN’S TEAM, DECLARED, AS HE
BEGAN SWIMMING AGAINST FEMALES, AND WINNING
RATHER EASILY, SOMETIMES BY MORE THAN 30 SECONDS,
SAID (QUOTE) ‘I FIND IT VERY REWARDING! (CLOSE QUOTE)! REWARDING INDEED! ABSOLUTE TOTAL
DISRESPECT FOR HIS FEMALE TEAMMATES! AND BRUCE
JENNER, AS CAITLYN JENNER, ALSO STRONGLY DISAGREES
WITH LIA’S RACING AGAINST FEMALES, SAYING
“IT’S NOT FAIR. WE HAVE TO PROTECT GIRL’S SPORTS IN
OUR SCHOOLS.”
YES, I EMPATHIZE WITH LIA’S RIGHT, BUT THERE’S ONE
FACET OF HIS TRANSITIONING WITH WHICH I STRONGLY
DISAGREE. IT ACTUALLY LIES AT THE HEART OF THE
DEBATE. FINA, SWIMMING’S INTERNATIONAL GOVERNING
BODY, RECENTLY ADOPTED A POLICY THAT ONLY PERMITS
SWIMMERS WHO TRANSITIONED BEFORE AGE 12 TO
COMPETE IN WOMEN’S EVENTS. TO FURTHER EXPLAIN THE
POLICY, I QUOTE: ‘THIS IS NOT SAYING THAT PEOPLE ARE ENCOURAGED TO TRANSITION BY AGE 12. IT’S WHAT THE
SCIENTISTS ARE SAYING, THAT IF YOU TRANSITION
AFTER THE START OF PUBERTY, YOU HAVE AN
ADVANTAGE WHICH IS UNFAIR.’ (CLOSE QUOTE). FOLLOW
THE SCIENCE! WE COULDN’T AGREE MORE. THE FINA
DOCUMENT WAS NO FLY BY NIGHT POLICY.
PRESENTATIONS WERE MADE BY THREE ENTITIES, AN
ATHLETE GROUP, A SCIENCE AND MEDICINE GROUP, AND
A LEGAL AND HUMAN RIGHTS GROUP. 71.5% VOTED IN
FAVOR OF THEIR RECOMMENDATIONS!
NOW TO THE WOKE COMMUNITY. BETTER TO LET
SLEEPING DOGS LIE. WOKESTERS HAVE POTENTIALLY
AWAKENED A NATIONAL SLEEPING GIANT TRIGGERED BY
EVENTS IN LOUDOUN COUNTY, VIRGINIA. AFTER LOUDOUN ADOPTED A TRANSGENDER POLICY, AND AFTER A SEXUAL ASSAULT OCCURRED IN A GIRL’S BATHROOM,
ARRESTS WERE MADE, LAWSUITS ENSUED AND PARENTS
DEMANDED MORE ACCOUNTABILITY IN WHAT THEIR KIDS
ARE TAUGHT. GUBERNATORIAL CANDIDATE TERRY
McAULIFFE WEIGHED IN: “I DON’T THINK
PARENTS SHOULD BE TELLING SCHOOLS WHAT THEY
SHOULD TEACH.”

IT BECAME AN
ELECTION ISSUE AND WHILE ANALYSTS ACKNOWLEDGED
THAT GLENN YOUNGKIN WAS ALREADY PROJECTED TO
WIN, THE ISSUE HELPED PROPEL GOVERNOR YOUNGKIN
INTO A MUCH SOUGHT OUT SPEAKER AS OTHER PARENT’S
GROUPS AND GOVERNORS SEEK HIS ADVICE. SO
WOKESTERS, BEWARE OF WHAT YOU WISH FOR.

AND I CAUTION MY FORMER PROFESSION, THE MEDIA,
YOU’RE CLEARLY OUT OF TOUCH WITH WHAT A MAJORITY
OF VOTERS ARE THINKING. IN FACT THE PRIME REASON I
LEFT JOURNALISM, A PROFESSION I LOVED, WAS BECAUSE
OF THE RAMPANT BIAS, SO BIASED THAT JOURNALISTS
ARE NO LONGER VERY RELEVANT, AND THAT’S A SHAME.
A QUICK REFRESHER: A JOURNALISM DEGREE IS A
BACHELOR OF SCIENCE DEGREE! I REPEAT, A BACHELOR
OF SCIENCE! WHEN I EARNED MY BACHELOR OF SCIENCE
FROM THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA’S SCHOOL OF
JOURNALISM, A SCHOOL ALWAYS IN THE NATION’S TOP
FIVE, I WAS TAUGHT THAT JOURNALISTS SHOULD REPORT
ON THE WHO, WHERE, WHY, WHAT, WHEN, LEAVING
ANALYSIS TO THE EDITORIAL PAGES. WHAT A QUAINT CONCEPT. ALLOW THE READER TO READ UNBIASED AND
IF THE READER SO DESIRES, TURN TO THE EDITORIAL
PAGES FOR ELUCIDATION.

I SEE MY TIME IS UP. I THANK YOU, MOST SINCERELY,
FOR YOURS.

Note: This presentation was made at the “Stop The Title IX Take-Over” rally, held on August 11, 2022, in Washington, D.C.