Men's Rights Archives - SAVE – Working for fairness and equal opportunities for men

Anthony Fauci and the Culture of Dishonesty at the NIH

Edward Bartlett — Sun, 02 Aug 2026 15:55:16 +0000

PRESS RELEASE

Contact: Henry Herrera

Telephone: +1-301-801-0608

Anthony Fauci and the Culture of Dishonesty at the NIH

August 3, 2026 — This past week, Americans were appalled to learn of the widespread falsehoods disseminated by Dr. Anthony Fauci, former head of the NIH National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease.

In particular, Fauci dishonestly claimed that (1):

The COVID virus originated from natural sources, not a lab leak in Wuhan, China.
“The NIH has not ever and does not now fund gain-of-function research in the Wuhan Institute of Virology” – a claim contradicted by statements from other NIH officials.
There was “no reason to be walking around with a mask,” as Fauci admitted on 60 Minutes, even though he had previously been a persistent advocate for universal masking.

Fauci’s falsehoods harmed the more than 50 million children in the United States who experienced school closures due to COVID-19 policies, resulting in severe learning loss and chronic absenteeism (2).

But Anthony Fauci was not the first high-level person at the National Institutes of Health to engage in a campaign of disinformation. For years, NIH leaders have been spreading the claim that women were “excluded” and “under-represented” from medical research:

Ruth Kirschstein, MD (first woman to lead a major NIH institute): Co-chaired a Task Force that highlighted an alleged “dearth of women enrolled in clinical trials” (3). Kirschstein also made the claim that the signal Framingham Heart Study included only men. (In fact, the Framingham study, first launched in 1948, was 55% female and 45% male (4)).
Bernadine Healy, MD (NIH Director, 1991–1993): Deplored what she called the “decades of sex-exclusive research.” (5)
Janine Austin Clayton, MD (current Director of the Office of Research for Women’s Health): Claimed, “We know less about female biology and we are struggling to catch up.” (6)
Vivian Pinn, MD (first full-time Director of ORWH, 1991–2011): Dramatically insisted, “The exclusion of some women in clinical research may sometimes be valid, but not all the women all the time.” (7)

These assertions lack essential details about the extent the exclusion, the affected diseases, and the relevant time period. And for good reason — they have no basis in reality:

A detailed analysis of studies conducted as early as the 1960s concluded, “Women have participated in medical research in numbers at least proportionate to the overall female population.” (8)
In 1994, Judith LaRosa of the NIH Office of Research on Women Health affirmed, “Little, if any, evidence is available that suggests that women have been systematically excluded from biomedical research.” (9)
A recent analysis concluded, “Between 1995 and 2025, the average annual distribution of NIH-funded research enrollments was 58% female, 40% male, and 2% unknown sex.” (10)

Women’s health researchers have profited handsomely from the falsehood of female exclusion. Women’s health has enjoyed dedicated funding that is more than twice as much as men’s health: 14% vs. 6% of the total NIH budget (11).

As a result, men are dying five years sooner than women, and we still don’t have the essential medical knowledge necessary to overcome the lifespan gender gap.science.org

SAVE – Stop Abusive and Violent Environments – is a 501(c)3 organization working to assure fairness and equal opportunities for men. SAVE welcomes financial contributions: https://www.saveservices.org/donate/

Links:

The post Anthony Fauci and the Culture of Dishonesty at the NIH appeared first on SAVE – Working for fairness and equal opportunities for men.

Men’s Health and the Rise of Female Supremacism

Edward Bartlett — Wed, 29 Jul 2026 21:59:45 +0000

PRESS RELEASE

Contact: Henry Herrera

Telephone: +1-301-801-0608

Email: info@saveservices.org

Men’s Health and the Rise of Female Supremacism

July 30, 2026 — American men die an average of 5 years sooner than women. The annual toll of premature male mortality is staggering in its impact on women and children:

700,000–800,000 women become widows each year following the death of their husbands (1),.This places the women at elevated risk of poverty (2), three times greater risk of being placed in a nursing home (3), and a 48% greater risk of widowhood mortality (4).
About 300,000 children annually lose their father due to premature male mortality (5), resulting in an array of educational, economic, and behavioral problems (6).

Given these facts, one would expect men’s health to rank as a high national priority. Sadly, it does not.

From 2000 to 2023, a total of 15 bills to advance men’s health have been introduced in every session of Congress. Despite solid bipartisan support, not a single one received a floor vote or was enacted into law. (7)

In the current session, the State of Men’s Health Act, HR 7602, was introduced to establish an Office of Men’s Health. Thus far, the bill has only 16 co-sponsors.

In sharp contrast, women’s health has become firmly institutionalized throughout the Department of Health and Human Services. Seven offices of women’s health currently operate at an annual cost to taxpayers of over $150 million:

National Institutes of Health
OASH Office of Women’s Health
Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality
Food and Drug Administration
Centers for Disease Control
Health Resources and Services Administration

There is a clear reason why DHHS has zero offices of men’s health — the powerful women’s health lobby is adamantly opposed to the idea.

In June, the Coalition for Men’s Health emailed each of the seven women’s health offices listed above, asking a simple question: “Do you support the establishment of an Office of Men’s Health in the Department of Health and Human Services?” The email requested only a ‘Yes’ or ‘No’ answer.

Weeks later, not a single office of women’s health had replied. As the aloof Queen Marie Antoinette famously retorted, “Let them eat cake.”

In addition, the women’s health lobby has perpetuated the myth that women were routinely “excluded” and “under-represented” from medical research, a claim repeatedly and definitively shown to be false (8, 9).

How do we explain an ideology that once claimed to champion “gender equality,” yet now opposes even basic programs to help men live longer, healthier lives?

The answer lies in the feminist literature that increasingly espouses a philosophy of female supremacism:

UN Women Executive Director Sima Bahous has repeatedly emphasized that “Women and girls must be central to humanitarian action.” (10)
Mads Larsen and colleagues have argued that “it is crucial to acknowledge that female emancipation required a return to the marginalization of the least sought-after men.” (11)
The World Health Organization openly calls for “Putting Women First” in domestic violence research (12).

Men, women, and children all benefit when men are healthier. But first, our society must confront the rise of female supremacism.

Links:

The post Men’s Health and the Rise of Female Supremacism appeared first on SAVE – Working for fairness and equal opportunities for men.

Gender Equality for Men: Efforts to Help Males Gain Momentum

Edward Bartlett — Thu, 23 Jul 2026 00:49:50 +0000

PRESS RELEASE

Contact: Henry Herrera

Telephone: +1-301-801-0608

Email: info@saveservices.org

Gender Equality for Men: Efforts to Help Males Gain Momentum

July 23, 2026 — In the past week, three notable political developments highlighted a growing national trend to address the disadvantages facing American men:

Last Wednesday, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth announced a new Pentagon policy to screen service members 30 years and older for testosterone deficiency. Hegseth described the initiative as “restoring and optimizing your natural capabilities, protecting your longevity,” and keeping troops on the “leading edge of lethality” for combat readiness. (1)
Two days later, Sen. Mark Kelley (D-Arizona) and John Curtis (R-Utah) introduced the Building Community in America Act to promote public service among men (2).
Three days later on Monday, the Virginia Advisory Commission for Boys and Men (3) held its first meeting since its establishment in April. The hearing featured presentations on male educational under-achievement (4).

Men are lagging behind women on a broad range of indicators — from longevity to educational attainment, from occupational mortality to homelessness, and many others (5). Leaders in both parties are beginning to respond.

Here are key bills and actions taken in recent months in Congress and in states across the country:

Mental Health: On July 1, Maryland Gov. Moore issued an impassioned call for greater attention to men’s mental health. “States must lead in the effort to combat young men’s loneliness, despair, and disengagement,” he penned (6).

State of Men’s Health Act: The closely watched bill, HR 7602, would establish an Office of Men’s Health in the Department of Health and Human Services. The bill has 14 co-sponsors (7 Republicans and 7 Democrats). Currently DHHS maintains seven offices of women’s health — and none for men’s health.

Fatherhood and Maternal Health: In June, Congress introduced the Dads Matter Act, S. 2131 and H.R. 5828, to encourage expectant fathers to become more engaged in their partners’ pregnancies.

Shared Parenting: Shared parenting bills were recently enacted or signed into law in two states — Louisiana (HB 1239) and Mississippi (HB 1662). In the past 12 months similar bills have been introduced in 10 other states to create a rebuttable presumption of equal parenting time following divorce: Arizona, California, Colorado, Michigan, New Hampshire, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, Vermont, and Wyoming.

State-Level Executive Branch Actions: Governors have taken notable steps in recent months:

California: Gov. Newsom Gavin issued an Executive Order to support young men and boys. (7)
Maryland: A $19 million investment to support men to become school teachers (8).
Michigan: The first “Moving Michigan Males Forward” convening was held on December 3, 2025 (9).
Utah: On January 8, 2026, Gov. Spencer Cox convened a Men and Boys Well-being Symposium. (10).

For years, government programs have focused primarily on supporting women, which has increasingly left men at a disadvantage. Now, the principle of “gender equality” is being applied more evenly — for the benefit of men as well.

SAVE – Stop Abusive and Violent Environments – is a 501(c)3 organization working to assure fairness and equal opportunities for men.

Links:

The post Gender Equality for Men: Efforts to Help Males Gain Momentum appeared first on SAVE – Working for fairness and equal opportunities for men.

Feminists Amass Billions as They Spread Falsehoods About Medical Research

Edward Bartlett — Sun, 19 Jul 2026 20:50:08 +0000

PRESS RELEASE

Contact: Henry Herrera

Telephone: +1-301-801-0608

Email: info@saveservices.org

Feminists Amass Billions as They Spread Falsehoods About Medical Research

July 20, 2026 — This past Wednesday a group of women gathered in Washington, DC to propose a $20 billion, taxpayer-funded project to close the “woman’s health gap” (1). Inexplicably, no one at the event mentioned the most glaring health gap of all — the fact that men are dying five years sooner than women.

In attendance at the event was Dr. Vivian Pinn, former director of the NIH Office of Research on Women’s Health. Dr. Pinn was one of the women who had schemed to convince Congress that women’s health research was being shortchanged. “The exclusion of some women in clinical research may sometimes be valid, but not all the women all the time,” Pinn claimed, without evidence, in her widely-cited 1993 article (2).

After her misleading article was published, a group of citizens requested a meeting with Dr. Pinn in her NIH office. “The data don’t support your conclusion,” the group charged. In response, Dr. Pinn offered this implausible explanation: “They misquoted me.”

End of discussion.

In 2001, an in-depth analysis of NIH research concluded that in fact, Dr. Pinn had misrepresented the truth. It was men, not women who had been underrepresented in the NIH research portfolio (3).

Indeed, extensive analyses have been conducted to nail down the elusive “woman’s health gap.” Dr. James Nuzzo reviewed government records to analyze sex-specific participation in NIH research. He found from 1995 to 2022, women composed 58% of all participants in NIH clinical trials (4) – no female underrepresentation to be found there.

But these facts haven’t dissuaded women’s health advocates from continuing their fictitious campaign:

The National Strategy to Close the Women’s Health Gap, which is now seeking $20 billion from American taxpayers, asserts, “for decades [women’s] health needs across conditions and stages of life have been understudied and underserved.” (5)
The Society for Women’s Health Research claims on its website, “Historically, women have been underrepresented in clinical research.” (6)

Neither report provided any details to back up their representations, such as the dates of the purported exclusion, the affected diseases, and the degree of the underrepresentation. These important details were left to the fevered imagination of the feminist activists.

Now, the “excluded and under-represented” theme has become embedded into a broader social narrative. An AI search concludes, “The claim that women were ‘excluded’ or ‘underrepresented’ in NIH-funded (or broader biomedical) research appears thousands of times across academic literature, reports, news articles, and policy documents.” (7)

Women’s health researchers have profited handsomely from the falsehood. Since 1993, women’s health research-related spending has been in the range of $80–120 billion (7), Women’s health has enjoyed more than twice as much dedicated funding as men’s health: 14% vs. 6% of the total NIH budget (8).

Medical research is supposed to be dedicated to the unfettered quest for objective truth. It is outrageous and wrong that our society has allowed a group of partisans to usurp the women’s health agenda, while men are allowed to die five years before their time without a murmur of protest.

SAVE – Stop Abusive and Violent Environments – is a 501(c)3 organization working to assure fairness and equal opportunities for men.

Links:

The post Feminists Amass Billions as They Spread Falsehoods About Medical Research appeared first on SAVE – Working for fairness and equal opportunities for men.

Women Are Some of the Strongest Supporters of Men’s Health

Edward Bartlett — Sun, 14 Jun 2026 21:37:35 +0000

PRESS RELEASE

Contact: Henry Herrera

Telephone: +1-301-801-0608

Email: info@saveservices.org

Women Are Some of the Strongest Supporters of Men’s Health

June 15, 2026 — June is Men’s Health Month, and it’s a time to reflect on a disturbing paradox: Even though men die five years sooner than women, the federal government currently has seven offices of women’s health, and zero offices of men’s health.

In Congress, lawmakers are debating passage of the State of Men’s Health Act, H.R. 7602, that would create the first federal Office of Men’s Health (1). And state lawmakers are reviewing the recent American Medical Association resolution calling on public health departments to establish offices of men’s health (2).

But conspicuously absent from the debate is how ending premature male mortality will also benefit women and wives. Research shows that widowhood imposes a heavy emotional, financial, and health toll on women:

Emotional and psychological trauma from bereavement: The sudden or early loss of a husband triggers intense grief, depression, loneliness, and anxiety. The Stanford Center on Longevity research highlights that women experience higher rates of sadness and psychological distress that can last for years (3).

Increased burdens of daily living: Widows often assume sole responsibility for household management, finances, and decision-making previously shared with a partner. This shift compounds their physical and cognitive loads (4).
Higher out-of-pocket medical expenditures: Bereavement often causes increased healthcare needs for the surviving spouse. Studies show increases in medical spending, as widows oversee their own health declines (5).
22% decline in income: Widowhood substantially raises the likelihood of falling into poverty. The Social Security Administration reports that women frequently experience income drops (around 22% in early years) and wealth depletion, with many falling into poverty (6).
Three times greater risk of being admitted to a nursing home: Losing a spouse dramatically increases the risk of institutionalization. Finnish and U.S. studies document hazard ratios exceeding three in the first month after bereavement (7).
48% greater mortality risk: Becoming widowed is associated with a 48% increase in mortality risk, according to Health and Retirement Study analyses. The loss of social support, shared resources, and companionship contributes to higher death rates among widows (8).

Evie Magazine columnist Lisa Britton reveals, “Our fathers, husbands, sons, and brothers continue to die earlier, suffer more, and receive far less institutional concern about their health than women.” (9)

Women should have a major say in debates about the establishment of the Office of Men’s Health. We encourage every woman to contact Assistant Secretary of Health Brian Christine, and urge him to take prompt action to establish an Office of Men’s Health:

Telephone: 202-690-7694
Email:ASH@hhs.gov

SAVE – Stop Abusive and Violent Environments – is a 501(c)3 organization working to assure due process, fairness, and equal opportunities for men.

Links:

The post Women Are Some of the Strongest Supporters of Men’s Health appeared first on SAVE – Working for fairness and equal opportunities for men.

The Myth of Patriarchy and the Media Fixation with Andrew Tate

Edward Bartlett — Thu, 11 Jun 2026 16:01:22 +0000

9PRESS RELEASE

Contact: Henry Herrera

Telephone: +1-301-801-0608

Email: info@saveservices.org

The Myth of Patriarchy and the Media Fixation with Andrew Tate

June 18, 2026 — Vilified by the international media as the epitome of masculine power, Andrew Tate has been harshly criticized for his views of women (1). But Tate’s reputation as a “cultural influencer” of young men is now being challenged.

Early surveys found that Tate was viewed as a positive role model by only a minority of young men (2). And now, Tate’s limited influence is on the wane.

A 2025 study conducted in the UK found that teenagers described Tate as “dead” or “just a meme now.” (3) More recently, a survey of American men ages 19-29 found that Tate ranked dead last in his appeal to young men (4).

So how did the media become so fixated with Andrew Tate?

In 1970, feminist Kate Millett published Sexual Politics, which framed patriarchy as society’s most fundamental and pervasive concept of power. She claimed that “every avenue of power within the society, including the coercive force of the police, is entirely in male hands.”

But in singling out the “coercive force of the police,” Millett revealed her naiveté about the workings of the criminal system. Research from around the world shows when men and women commit the same crime, the man is more likely to be arrested, charged, and convicted (5). And the woman is let off with the proverbial “slap of the wrist.”

Now it’s time to ask the basic question, “Is there really such a thing as ‘patriarchy’ in Western societies?”

Scientific studies and government surveys reveal that around the world, men are lagging behind women in numerous ways (6):

Lifespan and mental health: Men die approximately five years earlier than women worldwide.
Education: Women now outpace men in college enrollments.
Workplace safety: Men account for 92–95% of workplace fatalities in major industrial economies.
Incarceration: Roughly 10.9 million men are imprisoned worldwide, while female prisoners number less than one million.
Child labor: Boys make up the majority of children engaged in hazardous child labor.
Homelessness: Men comprise an estimated 76% of the global homeless population.
Media framing: A 2006 analysis found that 69% of news coverage of men was unfavorable.

If there really is such a thing as “patriarchy,” we must agree that the all-powerful patriarchs have done a rather poor job in their quest to advantage men.

SAVE – Stop Abusive and Violent Environments – is a 501(c)3 organization working to assure due process, fairness, and equal opportunities for men.

Links:

The post The Myth of Patriarchy and the Media Fixation with Andrew Tate appeared first on SAVE – Working for fairness and equal opportunities for men.

Five-Year Life Expectancy Gap Faces Hostility and Neglect

Edward Bartlett — Sun, 07 Jun 2026 14:25:45 +0000

PRESS RELEASE

Contact: Henry Herrera

Telephone: +1-301-801-0608

Email: info@saveservices.org

Five-Year Life Expectancy Gap Faces Hostility and Neglect

June 8, 2026 — Men around the world die approximately five years earlier than women — a persistent human cost that receives far less attention than comparable disparities affecting other groups. This gap constitutes a profound public health and human rights failure that compromises the economic productivity of nations around the world (1).

Despite men’s significantly shorter lifespans, along with dramatically higher male suicide rates (typically 3–4 times those of women) and workplace deaths, health policy and cultural discourse remain heavily skewed. National and international initiatives overwhelmingly prioritize women’s health while male vulnerability is often minimized, pathologized, or ignored.

Radical feminist voices have contributed to this climate by framing men as a problem to be fixed or ignored. In her 1967 SCUM Manifesto, Valerie Solanas declared: “Retaining the male has not even the dubious purpose of reproduction.” Sally Miller Gearhart proposed in 1982 that “The proportion of men must be reduced to and maintained at approximately 10% of the human race.” In 1999, Mary Daly argued that planetary survival would require “a drastic reduction of the population of males.” (2)

These ideas echo in modern social media discussions. Following the 2024 U.S. election, TikTok creator melaninmaven97 welcomed the prospect of men “offing” or “deleting” themselves. Podcaster Brad Polumbo criticized the woman’s hateful remarks, concluding that TikTok has become a “dark and toxic place.” (3)

In discussions of male suicide on Instagram, comments such as “Rates not high enough” (over 6,800 likes) and “Please up the rates” (over 3,300 likes) have drawn significant approval. (4)

The phrase “Kill all men” appears regularly in the Femosphere, with estimates of low thousands to tens of thousands of Twitter posts in May 2026 alone — rhetoric that rarely triggers enforcement under X’s gender-neutral Hateful Conduct policy (5).

These cultural patterns give rise to striking policy imbalances:

According to the World Health Organization’s 2023 SRMNCAH survey, 92% of responding countries maintain national strategies addressing women’s sexual, reproductive, maternal, and adolescent health (6). By comparison, only a small number of countries (such as Australia, Ireland, and Brazil) have developed dedicated national men’s health strategies (7).
The United States maintains seven federal offices dedicated to women’s health — and zero for men’s health (8).

Andrzej Łobaczewski, the Polish psychiatrist who analyzed totalitarian psychology in Political Ponerology, warned how ideological systems can render the suffering of designated out-groups invisible (9). Certain strains of contemporary feminism have fostered a climate in which male suffering elicits indifference or even satisfaction from some voices.

A five-year life expectancy gap is not a minor statistical footnote — it is a human rights travesty affecting half the world’s population. Boys and men also face disadvantages in education, family courts, and mental health support.

June is Men’s Health Month. Policymakers and health organizations should promptly establish dedicated men’s health offices and strategies, enforce content policies on social media, and promote approaches that value the lives and well-being of men and women equally.

SAVE – Stop Abusive and Violent Environments – is a 501(c)3 organization working to assure due process, fairness, and equal opportunities for men.

Links:

The post Five-Year Life Expectancy Gap Faces Hostility and Neglect appeared first on SAVE – Working for fairness and equal opportunities for men.

Jennifer Newsom Just Lost the Male Vote for Democrats

Edward Bartlett — Wed, 15 Apr 2026 15:27:44 +0000

PRESS RELEASE

Contact: Henry Herrera

Telephone: +1-301-801-0608

Email: info@saveservices.org

Jennifer Newsom Just Lost the Male Vote for Democrats

WASHINGTON / April 16, 2026 – For months, liberal operatives have been urging Democratic candidates to stop saying nasty things about male voters. In particular, Democratic strategist James Carville has been sharply critical of Democrats who indulge in “future is female” and #MeToo sloganeering (1).

And he seemed to be making progress…until last week.

That’s when a slew of media articles appeared that recounted over-the-top statements made by Jennifer Siebel Newsom, wife of California governor Gavin Newsom. Gavin Newsom is the leading Democratic candidate to run for president in 2028.

Below are some of Jennifer’s head-scratching statements about gender relations in America:

Professional Victim: Jennifer Newsom, who lives in a palatial $9 million estate, had no qualms in making the bizarre claim that, “The gender hierarchy is the oldest form of oppression. It’s the roots of oppression and it’s the template for all other oppression.” (2)

Female Chauvinist: “Every problem that we have in society right now will be fixed” when “more women are in the rooms making decisions, changing the status quo, and transforming not just our just culture but our society and our economy.” (3)

Patriarchy vs. Matriarchy: In her The Mask You Live In documentary, Newsom critiques “toxic masculinity” and “patriarchal” structures (4). But many persons dispute the notion that “patriarchal” structures exist, and argue the real concern is the emergence of powerful matriarchies, often referred to as the “Great Feminization.” (5)

Alt-Right Boogeyman: The California First Partner insists that boys are being influenced by an “alt-right socialization” that she believes are “very, very dangerous.” (6) Mrs. Newsom admitted that “I’ve given our boys dolls, even if they tear the head off.” The woman doesn’t seem to realize that decapitating dolls’ heads reveals the utter disgust of boys who are being coerced into incompatible gender roles.

NGO Profiteer: Jennifer Newsom runs the Representation Project, a charity that claims to be fighting “intersectional gender stereotypes.” According to a Daily Mail article, “The organization brings in between $1 million and $1.7 million a year in grants and donations, with roughly $300,000 of it going straight to her and her company in recent years, according to financial records.” (7)

Matt Walsh offered these cogent remarks about Jennifer Siebel Newsom:

“She’s the perfect feminist. Not only because she’s constantly out babbling about how men are evil, but also because her husband is trying to achieve something great (becoming president), and she is determined to put herself at the center of the story and absolutely destroy his dream in the process….A very instructive cautionary tale for young men. Never marry a feminist. She will ruin your life. Guaranteed.” (8)

SAVE – Stop Abusive and Violent Environments – is a 501(c)3 organization working to assure due process, fairness, and equal opportunities for men.

Links:

The post Jennifer Newsom Just Lost the Male Vote for Democrats appeared first on SAVE – Working for fairness and equal opportunities for men.

Historic Breakthroughs as Men Notch Advances Across the Nation

Edward Bartlett — Tue, 31 Mar 2026 14:07:30 +0000

PRESS RELEASE

Contact: Henry Herrera

Telephone: +1-301-801-0608

Email: info@saveservices.org

Historic Breakthroughs as Men Notch Advances Across the Nation

WASHINGTON / April 1, 2026 – This past week witnessed a series of historic advances for men and boys at the state and federal levels:

California Gov. Gavin Newsom convened state leaders in Sacramento to review progress in implementing his whole-of-government Executive Order that he issued last year. Newsom noted, “Today’s convening underscored what’s possible when we come together to support the next generation.” (1)
The Massachusetts Commission on the Status of Boys and Men was launched to create a permanent body to help men and boys. (2)
The Institute for Family Studies issued a landmark, 74-page report on the challenges faced by young men. (3)
The Coalition for an Office on Men’s Health, sponsored by SAVE, was launched consisting of 10 member organizations. The Coalition is working to establish the first-ever office on men’s health in the Department of Health and Human Services. (4)
Representatives from the National Council for Equal Shared Parenting met with federal lawmakers in Washington, DC to discuss the importance of equal shared parenting for fathers. (5)

To date, three bills designed to support men and boys have been introduced in Congress (6):

White House Council on Fathers and Sons Act, H.R. 7800
Dads Matter Act, H.R. 5828 and S. 2131
State of Men’s Health Act, H.R. 7602

In Virginia, SB447 would create an Advisory Commission for Boys and Men. The bill was overwhelmingly approved in the House and Senate, and now awaits final approval by Gov. Abigail Spanberger. (7)

In addition, numerous media reports during the past week highlighted the problem of men as victims of domestic violence. One widely circulated video depicted Taylor Frankie Paul of The Bachelorette and Secret Lives of Mormon Wives hurling a chair at her boyfriend in 2023. (8) Subsequent incidents of alleged abuse by the woman have been reported, as well. (9, 10)

Following the Taylor Frankie Paul episodes, at least two full-length articles have been published about male victims of female-perpetrated abuse:

Lisa Britton, Evie Magazine: “The Side of Domestic Violence Nobody Will Say Out Loud” (11)
Emma Johnson, Best Interest: “Now Mainstream: Women are Violent, Too” (12)

The November mid-term elections are approaching in seven months. In anticipation, SAVE has prepared a PowerPoint program on How to Engage with the Male Voter to Assure Election Victory. (13)

SAVE – Stop Abusive and Violent Environments – is a 501(c)3 organization working to assure due process, fairness, and equal opportunities for men.

Links:

The post Historic Breakthroughs as Men Notch Advances Across the Nation appeared first on SAVE – Working for fairness and equal opportunities for men.

Young Men are Not ‘Lost.’ Rather, They Are Under Assault.

Edward Bartlett — Wed, 25 Mar 2026 19:58:55 +0000

PRESS RELEASE

Contact: Henry Herrera

Telephone: +1-301-801-0608

Email: info@saveservices.org

Young Men are Not ‘Lost.’ Rather, They Are Under Assault.

WASHINGTON / March 26, 2026 – No one disputes the fact that men are disengaging from romantic relationships with members of the female sex. The question is, Why? A recent survey by the Institute for Family Studies sheds light on this cultural divide.

The survey queried 2,000 unmarried men ages 18-29 about their dating efforts. One question found that 52% of the men strongly or somewhat agreed with this statement: “I’ve tried to find someone to go out with me, but it has been difficult.” (1)

And 58% of the young men agreed with the statement that “I am reluctant to ask someone out because I fear being rejected.”

In other words, a majority of young men have tried to connect romantically with women, but find themselves confronting a seemingly endless series of dilemmas, such as:

Should he pay for dinner, or split the cost 50-50?
Is he looking for a career woman, even if she wants a “tradwife” relationship?
If he is confident and decisive, will she deride him for being too “macho”?

When men set out in search of a romantic relationship, they also encounter a cultural narrative that ridicules and demeans men. Last year the New York Times published an opinion piece by Jean Garnett with the title, “The Trouble with Wanting Men.”

The commentary opens with this sweeping accusation: “Women are so fed up with dating men that the phenomenon even has a name: heterofatalism.” (2) These are just a few of the article’s make-believe stereotypes:

“men are what is rotten in the state of straightness.”
“Where were the men who could handle hard stuff? Like leaving the house for sex?”
“I experience desire in terms of a struggle that someone must lose.”

In response, Rikki Schlott of the New York Post charged Garnett’s article is “part of a genre of man-hating thought pieces that turn hetero love and dating into an all-out gender war — and totally absolve women of any agency or responsibility in their relationships.” (3)

Schlott trenchantly concludes, “outlets like the Times seem hellbent on amplifying the voices of the most bitter and dysfunctional women who bring their misery upon themselves and distract from the actual issues at hand.”

Recent data show men often hold stronger pro-family values than women. Compared to women, men are more likely to view marriage positively (38% vs. 22%), aspire to parenthood (57% vs. 45%), prefer larger families (48% vs. 37%), and identify as pro-life (47% vs. 44%). Men also exhibit lower rates of marital infidelity and divorce initiation. (4)

So the New York Times needs to reconsider its anti-male crusade, and men need to speak out assertively in the face of such editorial drivel.

SAVE – Stop Abusive and Violent Environments – is a 501(c)3 organization working to assure due process, fairness, and equal opportunities for men.

Links:

The post Young Men are Not ‘Lost.’ Rather, They Are Under Assault. appeared first on SAVE – Working for fairness and equal opportunities for men.