Men and Boys Archives - SAVE – Working for fairness and equal opportunities for men

Anthony Fauci and the Culture of Dishonesty at the NIH

Edward Bartlett — Sun, 02 Aug 2026 15:55:16 +0000

PRESS RELEASE

Contact: Henry Herrera

Telephone: +1-301-801-0608

Anthony Fauci and the Culture of Dishonesty at the NIH

August 3, 2026 — This past week, Americans were appalled to learn of the widespread falsehoods disseminated by Dr. Anthony Fauci, former head of the NIH National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease.

In particular, Fauci dishonestly claimed that (1):

The COVID virus originated from natural sources, not a lab leak in Wuhan, China.
“The NIH has not ever and does not now fund gain-of-function research in the Wuhan Institute of Virology” – a claim contradicted by statements from other NIH officials.
There was “no reason to be walking around with a mask,” as Fauci admitted on 60 Minutes, even though he had previously been a persistent advocate for universal masking.

Fauci’s falsehoods harmed the more than 50 million children in the United States who experienced school closures due to COVID-19 policies, resulting in severe learning loss and chronic absenteeism (2).

But Anthony Fauci was not the first high-level person at the National Institutes of Health to engage in a campaign of disinformation. For years, NIH leaders have been spreading the claim that women were “excluded” and “under-represented” from medical research:

Ruth Kirschstein, MD (first woman to lead a major NIH institute): Co-chaired a Task Force that highlighted an alleged “dearth of women enrolled in clinical trials” (3). Kirschstein also made the claim that the signal Framingham Heart Study included only men. (In fact, the Framingham study, first launched in 1948, was 55% female and 45% male (4)).
Bernadine Healy, MD (NIH Director, 1991–1993): Deplored what she called the “decades of sex-exclusive research.” (5)
Janine Austin Clayton, MD (current Director of the Office of Research for Women’s Health): Claimed, “We know less about female biology and we are struggling to catch up.” (6)
Vivian Pinn, MD (first full-time Director of ORWH, 1991–2011): Dramatically insisted, “The exclusion of some women in clinical research may sometimes be valid, but not all the women all the time.” (7)

These assertions lack essential details about the extent the exclusion, the affected diseases, and the relevant time period. And for good reason — they have no basis in reality:

A detailed analysis of studies conducted as early as the 1960s concluded, “Women have participated in medical research in numbers at least proportionate to the overall female population.” (8)
In 1994, Judith LaRosa of the NIH Office of Research on Women Health affirmed, “Little, if any, evidence is available that suggests that women have been systematically excluded from biomedical research.” (9)
A recent analysis concluded, “Between 1995 and 2025, the average annual distribution of NIH-funded research enrollments was 58% female, 40% male, and 2% unknown sex.” (10)

Women’s health researchers have profited handsomely from the falsehood of female exclusion. Women’s health has enjoyed dedicated funding that is more than twice as much as men’s health: 14% vs. 6% of the total NIH budget (11).

As a result, men are dying five years sooner than women, and we still don’t have the essential medical knowledge necessary to overcome the lifespan gender gap.science.org

SAVE – Stop Abusive and Violent Environments – is a 501(c)3 organization working to assure fairness and equal opportunities for men. SAVE welcomes financial contributions: https://www.saveservices.org/donate/

Links:

The post Anthony Fauci and the Culture of Dishonesty at the NIH appeared first on SAVE – Working for fairness and equal opportunities for men.

Men’s Health and the Rise of Female Supremacism

Edward Bartlett — Wed, 29 Jul 2026 21:59:45 +0000

PRESS RELEASE

Contact: Henry Herrera

Telephone: +1-301-801-0608

Email: info@saveservices.org

Men’s Health and the Rise of Female Supremacism

July 30, 2026 — American men die an average of 5 years sooner than women. The annual toll of premature male mortality is staggering in its impact on women and children:

700,000–800,000 women become widows each year following the death of their husbands (1),.This places the women at elevated risk of poverty (2), three times greater risk of being placed in a nursing home (3), and a 48% greater risk of widowhood mortality (4).
About 300,000 children annually lose their father due to premature male mortality (5), resulting in an array of educational, economic, and behavioral problems (6).

Given these facts, one would expect men’s health to rank as a high national priority. Sadly, it does not.

From 2000 to 2023, a total of 15 bills to advance men’s health have been introduced in every session of Congress. Despite solid bipartisan support, not a single one received a floor vote or was enacted into law. (7)

In the current session, the State of Men’s Health Act, HR 7602, was introduced to establish an Office of Men’s Health. Thus far, the bill has only 16 co-sponsors.

In sharp contrast, women’s health has become firmly institutionalized throughout the Department of Health and Human Services. Seven offices of women’s health currently operate at an annual cost to taxpayers of over $150 million:

National Institutes of Health
OASH Office of Women’s Health
Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality
Food and Drug Administration
Centers for Disease Control
Health Resources and Services Administration

There is a clear reason why DHHS has zero offices of men’s health — the powerful women’s health lobby is adamantly opposed to the idea.

In June, the Coalition for Men’s Health emailed each of the seven women’s health offices listed above, asking a simple question: “Do you support the establishment of an Office of Men’s Health in the Department of Health and Human Services?” The email requested only a ‘Yes’ or ‘No’ answer.

Weeks later, not a single office of women’s health had replied. As the aloof Queen Marie Antoinette famously retorted, “Let them eat cake.”

In addition, the women’s health lobby has perpetuated the myth that women were routinely “excluded” and “under-represented” from medical research, a claim repeatedly and definitively shown to be false (8, 9).

How do we explain an ideology that once claimed to champion “gender equality,” yet now opposes even basic programs to help men live longer, healthier lives?

The answer lies in the feminist literature that increasingly espouses a philosophy of female supremacism:

UN Women Executive Director Sima Bahous has repeatedly emphasized that “Women and girls must be central to humanitarian action.” (10)
Mads Larsen and colleagues have argued that “it is crucial to acknowledge that female emancipation required a return to the marginalization of the least sought-after men.” (11)
The World Health Organization openly calls for “Putting Women First” in domestic violence research (12).

Men, women, and children all benefit when men are healthier. But first, our society must confront the rise of female supremacism.

Links:

The post Men’s Health and the Rise of Female Supremacism appeared first on SAVE – Working for fairness and equal opportunities for men.

Gender Equality for Men: Efforts to Help Males Gain Momentum

Edward Bartlett — Thu, 23 Jul 2026 00:49:50 +0000

PRESS RELEASE

Contact: Henry Herrera

Telephone: +1-301-801-0608

Email: info@saveservices.org

Gender Equality for Men: Efforts to Help Males Gain Momentum

July 23, 2026 — In the past week, three notable political developments highlighted a growing national trend to address the disadvantages facing American men:

Last Wednesday, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth announced a new Pentagon policy to screen service members 30 years and older for testosterone deficiency. Hegseth described the initiative as “restoring and optimizing your natural capabilities, protecting your longevity,” and keeping troops on the “leading edge of lethality” for combat readiness. (1)
Two days later, Sen. Mark Kelley (D-Arizona) and John Curtis (R-Utah) introduced the Building Community in America Act to promote public service among men (2).
Three days later on Monday, the Virginia Advisory Commission for Boys and Men (3) held its first meeting since its establishment in April. The hearing featured presentations on male educational under-achievement (4).

Men are lagging behind women on a broad range of indicators — from longevity to educational attainment, from occupational mortality to homelessness, and many others (5). Leaders in both parties are beginning to respond.

Here are key bills and actions taken in recent months in Congress and in states across the country:

Mental Health: On July 1, Maryland Gov. Moore issued an impassioned call for greater attention to men’s mental health. “States must lead in the effort to combat young men’s loneliness, despair, and disengagement,” he penned (6).

State of Men’s Health Act: The closely watched bill, HR 7602, would establish an Office of Men’s Health in the Department of Health and Human Services. The bill has 14 co-sponsors (7 Republicans and 7 Democrats). Currently DHHS maintains seven offices of women’s health — and none for men’s health.

Fatherhood and Maternal Health: In June, Congress introduced the Dads Matter Act, S. 2131 and H.R. 5828, to encourage expectant fathers to become more engaged in their partners’ pregnancies.

Shared Parenting: Shared parenting bills were recently enacted or signed into law in two states — Louisiana (HB 1239) and Mississippi (HB 1662). In the past 12 months similar bills have been introduced in 10 other states to create a rebuttable presumption of equal parenting time following divorce: Arizona, California, Colorado, Michigan, New Hampshire, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, Vermont, and Wyoming.

State-Level Executive Branch Actions: Governors have taken notable steps in recent months:

California: Gov. Newsom Gavin issued an Executive Order to support young men and boys. (7)
Maryland: A $19 million investment to support men to become school teachers (8).
Michigan: The first “Moving Michigan Males Forward” convening was held on December 3, 2025 (9).
Utah: On January 8, 2026, Gov. Spencer Cox convened a Men and Boys Well-being Symposium. (10).

For years, government programs have focused primarily on supporting women, which has increasingly left men at a disadvantage. Now, the principle of “gender equality” is being applied more evenly — for the benefit of men as well.

SAVE – Stop Abusive and Violent Environments – is a 501(c)3 organization working to assure fairness and equal opportunities for men.

Links:

The post Gender Equality for Men: Efforts to Help Males Gain Momentum appeared first on SAVE – Working for fairness and equal opportunities for men.

Feminists Amass Billions as They Spread Falsehoods About Medical Research

Edward Bartlett — Sun, 19 Jul 2026 20:50:08 +0000

PRESS RELEASE

Contact: Henry Herrera

Telephone: +1-301-801-0608

Email: info@saveservices.org

Feminists Amass Billions as They Spread Falsehoods About Medical Research

July 20, 2026 — This past Wednesday a group of women gathered in Washington, DC to propose a $20 billion, taxpayer-funded project to close the “woman’s health gap” (1). Inexplicably, no one at the event mentioned the most glaring health gap of all — the fact that men are dying five years sooner than women.

In attendance at the event was Dr. Vivian Pinn, former director of the NIH Office of Research on Women’s Health. Dr. Pinn was one of the women who had schemed to convince Congress that women’s health research was being shortchanged. “The exclusion of some women in clinical research may sometimes be valid, but not all the women all the time,” Pinn claimed, without evidence, in her widely-cited 1993 article (2).

After her misleading article was published, a group of citizens requested a meeting with Dr. Pinn in her NIH office. “The data don’t support your conclusion,” the group charged. In response, Dr. Pinn offered this implausible explanation: “They misquoted me.”

End of discussion.

In 2001, an in-depth analysis of NIH research concluded that in fact, Dr. Pinn had misrepresented the truth. It was men, not women who had been underrepresented in the NIH research portfolio (3).

Indeed, extensive analyses have been conducted to nail down the elusive “woman’s health gap.” Dr. James Nuzzo reviewed government records to analyze sex-specific participation in NIH research. He found from 1995 to 2022, women composed 58% of all participants in NIH clinical trials (4) – no female underrepresentation to be found there.

But these facts haven’t dissuaded women’s health advocates from continuing their fictitious campaign:

The National Strategy to Close the Women’s Health Gap, which is now seeking $20 billion from American taxpayers, asserts, “for decades [women’s] health needs across conditions and stages of life have been understudied and underserved.” (5)
The Society for Women’s Health Research claims on its website, “Historically, women have been underrepresented in clinical research.” (6)

Neither report provided any details to back up their representations, such as the dates of the purported exclusion, the affected diseases, and the degree of the underrepresentation. These important details were left to the fevered imagination of the feminist activists.

Now, the “excluded and under-represented” theme has become embedded into a broader social narrative. An AI search concludes, “The claim that women were ‘excluded’ or ‘underrepresented’ in NIH-funded (or broader biomedical) research appears thousands of times across academic literature, reports, news articles, and policy documents.” (7)

Women’s health researchers have profited handsomely from the falsehood. Since 1993, women’s health research-related spending has been in the range of $80–120 billion (7), Women’s health has enjoyed more than twice as much dedicated funding as men’s health: 14% vs. 6% of the total NIH budget (8).

Medical research is supposed to be dedicated to the unfettered quest for objective truth. It is outrageous and wrong that our society has allowed a group of partisans to usurp the women’s health agenda, while men are allowed to die five years before their time without a murmur of protest.

SAVE – Stop Abusive and Violent Environments – is a 501(c)3 organization working to assure fairness and equal opportunities for men.

Links:

The post Feminists Amass Billions as They Spread Falsehoods About Medical Research appeared first on SAVE – Working for fairness and equal opportunities for men.

$20 Billion: Latest Scare-Tactic of the Women’s Health Lobby

Edward Bartlett — Sat, 11 Jul 2026 12:11:15 +0000

PRESS RELEASE

Contact: Henry Herrera

Telephone: +1-301-801-0608

Email: info@saveservices.org

$20 Billion: Latest Scare-Tactic of the Women’s Health Lobby

July 13, 2026 — On nearly every health indicator, men are lagging behind women. Men are dying five years sooner, account for the vast majority of workplace deaths, and face suicide rates 3-4 times higher than women.

Despite these disparities, public health programs continue to devote far more resources to women’s health than to men’s health:

The federal Department of Health and Human Services maintains 7 offices of women’s health — and zero offices of men’s health (1).
Each year the National Institutes of Health allocates 2-3 times more funding for women’s research than men’s health research (2).
Every state public health department operates a program focused on women’s or maternal health, yet only three states – Illinois, Connecticut, and North Dakota – have offices of men’s health (3).

In past decades, women’s health advocates blocked efforts to address men’s health by claiming — falsely — that women had been “excluded” and “underrepresented” from medical research.

In 1993, the editor of the New England Journal of Medicine made the categorical – and spurious — claim that “There is little doubt that women have been systematically excluded as subjects for study.” And LaRosa and Pinn lamented, “The exclusion of some women from clinical studies may sometimes be valid, but not all the women all the time.” (4)

Subsequent analyses have thoroughly debunked these assertions. A Government Accountability Office report revealed, “GAO found that women were a majority of the clinical trial participants in the new drug applications (NDA) it examined, and that every NDA included enough women in the pivotal studies to be able to statistically demonstrate that the drug is effective in women.” More recent data show that women accounted for 58% of all participants in NIH-funded research over the past 28 years — clear evidence against claims of under-representation (5).

Today, momentum is building to establish the first-ever Office of Men’s Health in the Department of Health and Human Services. Legislation (H.R. 7602) has been introduced in Congress. And DHHS Assistant Secretary for Health Brian Christine has expounded on the “crisis” of men’s health (6).

Yet the women’s health lobby continues to promote the same discredited narrative. The Society for Women’s Health Research, for example, claims that women remain “often underrepresented and inadequately considered in medical and public health research.” (7)

On July 15, the group and its partners will publicly release a proposal in Washington, DC to close what they falsely call the “women’s health gap” — at an estimated cost of $20 billion to American taxpayers (8).

Americans rightly take pride in the world-class universities and research institutions located in the United States. It is troubling when advocacy organizations exploit false claims of “exclusion” and “under-representation” to justify imposing a $20 billion burden on taxpayers. A more balanced and evidence-based approach to public health programs is long overdue (9).

SAVE – Stop Abusive and Violent Environments – is a 501(c)3 organization working to assure due process, fairness, and equal opportunities for men.

Links:

The post $20 Billion: Latest Scare-Tactic of the Women’s Health Lobby appeared first on SAVE – Working for fairness and equal opportunities for men.

Women Are Some of the Strongest Supporters of Men’s Health

Edward Bartlett — Sun, 14 Jun 2026 21:37:35 +0000

PRESS RELEASE

Contact: Henry Herrera

Telephone: +1-301-801-0608

Email: info@saveservices.org

Women Are Some of the Strongest Supporters of Men’s Health

June 15, 2026 — June is Men’s Health Month, and it’s a time to reflect on a disturbing paradox: Even though men die five years sooner than women, the federal government currently has seven offices of women’s health, and zero offices of men’s health.

In Congress, lawmakers are debating passage of the State of Men’s Health Act, H.R. 7602, that would create the first federal Office of Men’s Health (1). And state lawmakers are reviewing the recent American Medical Association resolution calling on public health departments to establish offices of men’s health (2).

But conspicuously absent from the debate is how ending premature male mortality will also benefit women and wives. Research shows that widowhood imposes a heavy emotional, financial, and health toll on women:

Emotional and psychological trauma from bereavement: The sudden or early loss of a husband triggers intense grief, depression, loneliness, and anxiety. The Stanford Center on Longevity research highlights that women experience higher rates of sadness and psychological distress that can last for years (3).

Increased burdens of daily living: Widows often assume sole responsibility for household management, finances, and decision-making previously shared with a partner. This shift compounds their physical and cognitive loads (4).
Higher out-of-pocket medical expenditures: Bereavement often causes increased healthcare needs for the surviving spouse. Studies show increases in medical spending, as widows oversee their own health declines (5).
22% decline in income: Widowhood substantially raises the likelihood of falling into poverty. The Social Security Administration reports that women frequently experience income drops (around 22% in early years) and wealth depletion, with many falling into poverty (6).
Three times greater risk of being admitted to a nursing home: Losing a spouse dramatically increases the risk of institutionalization. Finnish and U.S. studies document hazard ratios exceeding three in the first month after bereavement (7).
48% greater mortality risk: Becoming widowed is associated with a 48% increase in mortality risk, according to Health and Retirement Study analyses. The loss of social support, shared resources, and companionship contributes to higher death rates among widows (8).

Evie Magazine columnist Lisa Britton reveals, “Our fathers, husbands, sons, and brothers continue to die earlier, suffer more, and receive far less institutional concern about their health than women.” (9)

Women should have a major say in debates about the establishment of the Office of Men’s Health. We encourage every woman to contact Assistant Secretary of Health Brian Christine, and urge him to take prompt action to establish an Office of Men’s Health:

Telephone: 202-690-7694
Email:ASH@hhs.gov

SAVE – Stop Abusive and Violent Environments – is a 501(c)3 organization working to assure due process, fairness, and equal opportunities for men.

Links:

The post Women Are Some of the Strongest Supporters of Men’s Health appeared first on SAVE – Working for fairness and equal opportunities for men.

The Myth of Patriarchy and the Media Fixation with Andrew Tate

Edward Bartlett — Thu, 11 Jun 2026 16:01:22 +0000

9PRESS RELEASE

Contact: Henry Herrera

Telephone: +1-301-801-0608

Email: info@saveservices.org

The Myth of Patriarchy and the Media Fixation with Andrew Tate

June 18, 2026 — Vilified by the international media as the epitome of masculine power, Andrew Tate has been harshly criticized for his views of women (1). But Tate’s reputation as a “cultural influencer” of young men is now being challenged.

Early surveys found that Tate was viewed as a positive role model by only a minority of young men (2). And now, Tate’s limited influence is on the wane.

A 2025 study conducted in the UK found that teenagers described Tate as “dead” or “just a meme now.” (3) More recently, a survey of American men ages 19-29 found that Tate ranked dead last in his appeal to young men (4).

So how did the media become so fixated with Andrew Tate?

In 1970, feminist Kate Millett published Sexual Politics, which framed patriarchy as society’s most fundamental and pervasive concept of power. She claimed that “every avenue of power within the society, including the coercive force of the police, is entirely in male hands.”

But in singling out the “coercive force of the police,” Millett revealed her naiveté about the workings of the criminal system. Research from around the world shows when men and women commit the same crime, the man is more likely to be arrested, charged, and convicted (5). And the woman is let off with the proverbial “slap of the wrist.”

Now it’s time to ask the basic question, “Is there really such a thing as ‘patriarchy’ in Western societies?”

Scientific studies and government surveys reveal that around the world, men are lagging behind women in numerous ways (6):

Lifespan and mental health: Men die approximately five years earlier than women worldwide.
Education: Women now outpace men in college enrollments.
Workplace safety: Men account for 92–95% of workplace fatalities in major industrial economies.
Incarceration: Roughly 10.9 million men are imprisoned worldwide, while female prisoners number less than one million.
Child labor: Boys make up the majority of children engaged in hazardous child labor.
Homelessness: Men comprise an estimated 76% of the global homeless population.
Media framing: A 2006 analysis found that 69% of news coverage of men was unfavorable.

If there really is such a thing as “patriarchy,” we must agree that the all-powerful patriarchs have done a rather poor job in their quest to advantage men.

SAVE – Stop Abusive and Violent Environments – is a 501(c)3 organization working to assure due process, fairness, and equal opportunities for men.

Links:

The post The Myth of Patriarchy and the Media Fixation with Andrew Tate appeared first on SAVE – Working for fairness and equal opportunities for men.

Five-Year Life Expectancy Gap Faces Hostility and Neglect

Edward Bartlett — Sun, 07 Jun 2026 14:25:45 +0000

PRESS RELEASE

Contact: Henry Herrera

Telephone: +1-301-801-0608

Email: info@saveservices.org

Five-Year Life Expectancy Gap Faces Hostility and Neglect

June 8, 2026 — Men around the world die approximately five years earlier than women — a persistent human cost that receives far less attention than comparable disparities affecting other groups. This gap constitutes a profound public health and human rights failure that compromises the economic productivity of nations around the world (1).

Despite men’s significantly shorter lifespans, along with dramatically higher male suicide rates (typically 3–4 times those of women) and workplace deaths, health policy and cultural discourse remain heavily skewed. National and international initiatives overwhelmingly prioritize women’s health while male vulnerability is often minimized, pathologized, or ignored.

Radical feminist voices have contributed to this climate by framing men as a problem to be fixed or ignored. In her 1967 SCUM Manifesto, Valerie Solanas declared: “Retaining the male has not even the dubious purpose of reproduction.” Sally Miller Gearhart proposed in 1982 that “The proportion of men must be reduced to and maintained at approximately 10% of the human race.” In 1999, Mary Daly argued that planetary survival would require “a drastic reduction of the population of males.” (2)

These ideas echo in modern social media discussions. Following the 2024 U.S. election, TikTok creator melaninmaven97 welcomed the prospect of men “offing” or “deleting” themselves. Podcaster Brad Polumbo criticized the woman’s hateful remarks, concluding that TikTok has become a “dark and toxic place.” (3)

In discussions of male suicide on Instagram, comments such as “Rates not high enough” (over 6,800 likes) and “Please up the rates” (over 3,300 likes) have drawn significant approval. (4)

The phrase “Kill all men” appears regularly in the Femosphere, with estimates of low thousands to tens of thousands of Twitter posts in May 2026 alone — rhetoric that rarely triggers enforcement under X’s gender-neutral Hateful Conduct policy (5).

These cultural patterns give rise to striking policy imbalances:

According to the World Health Organization’s 2023 SRMNCAH survey, 92% of responding countries maintain national strategies addressing women’s sexual, reproductive, maternal, and adolescent health (6). By comparison, only a small number of countries (such as Australia, Ireland, and Brazil) have developed dedicated national men’s health strategies (7).
The United States maintains seven federal offices dedicated to women’s health — and zero for men’s health (8).

Andrzej Łobaczewski, the Polish psychiatrist who analyzed totalitarian psychology in Political Ponerology, warned how ideological systems can render the suffering of designated out-groups invisible (9). Certain strains of contemporary feminism have fostered a climate in which male suffering elicits indifference or even satisfaction from some voices.

A five-year life expectancy gap is not a minor statistical footnote — it is a human rights travesty affecting half the world’s population. Boys and men also face disadvantages in education, family courts, and mental health support.

June is Men’s Health Month. Policymakers and health organizations should promptly establish dedicated men’s health offices and strategies, enforce content policies on social media, and promote approaches that value the lives and well-being of men and women equally.

SAVE – Stop Abusive and Violent Environments – is a 501(c)3 organization working to assure due process, fairness, and equal opportunities for men.

Links:

The post Five-Year Life Expectancy Gap Faces Hostility and Neglect appeared first on SAVE – Working for fairness and equal opportunities for men.

Democrats Hit With Double-Dose of Bad News About Male Voters

Edward Bartlett — Tue, 26 May 2026 13:47:28 +0000

PRESS RELEASE

Contact: Henry Herrera

Telephone: +1-301-801-0608

Email: info@saveservices.org

Democrats Hit With Double-Dose of Bad News About Male Voters

WASHINGTON / May 27, 2026 – Last week was a spectacularly bad one for members of the Democratic party.

First, the Quinnipiac poll revealed on Wednesday that Congressional Democrats are garnering only a 16% job approval from American men (1).

Overall, the poll found that only 20% of registered voters approve of the way Democrats are handling their job in Congress. The male respondents likely were responding to Rep. Alexandria Ocasio Cortez, who has become famous for making laughable claims such as her recent gaffe that Venezuela lies “below the equator.”

Many of AOC’s inflammatory remarks have targeted men (2):

“Misogyny transcends political ideology: left, right, center. This grip of patriarchy affects all of us, not just women.”
“Men suffer from being under patriarchy. They don’t go to the doctor. They suffer from much higher rates of completed suicides.”
“‘Boys will be boys.’ Is that also the reason why you’ve chosen to block the Violence Against Women Act too, Mitch McConnell?”

The second dose of bad news arrived the very next day. The Democratic National Committee released the autopsy of its failed 2024 presidential campaign (3), in which Donald Trump won a majority of all votes cast and handily carried all seven swing states.

The 192-page DNC document – replete with typos, missing footnotes, and non-sequiturs — admitted that the “national campaign had a specific problem with male voters….Harris saw dramatic drops in support among young Latino men and young Black men compared to Biden’s 2020 performance.” (4)

The document concluded that male voters “require direct engagement. The gender gap can be narrowed. Deploy male messengers, address economic concerns, and don’t assume identity politics will hold male voters of color.”

Inexplicably, the DNC report made no mention of the hot-button issues that are likely to engage male voters, such as inflation, gas prices, or religion. In fact, the entire report refused to even mention the words, “white men.”

Recent data show men hold stronger pro-family values than women. Compared to women, men are more likely to view marriage positively (38% vs. 22%), aspire to parenthood (57% vs. 45%), and prefer larger families (48% vs. 37%). Men also exhibit lower rates of marital infidelity and divorce initiation. (5)

If Democrats seriously aspire to reconnect with male voters, above all they need to reconsider their long-standing embrace of feminist ideology.

Negative views of feminism are on the upswing. Last month, Evie Magazine published an article titled, “Hating Men Isn’t Improving Your Life.” Commentator Lisa Britton declared bluntly, “Female-led misandry is mainstream, and it’s in our schools, our media, our Hollywood blockbusters, and our university lecture halls. Podcasts hosted by women casually trash men as toxic, incompetent, sexist or irredeemable…The hatred isn’t just on the fringes. It’s everywhere.” (6)

Democrats need to make major changes, or brace for yet another round of stunning losses this coming November.

SAVE – Stop Abusive and Violent Environments – is a 501(c)3 organization working to assure due process, fairness, and equal opportunities for men.

Links:

The post Democrats Hit With Double-Dose of Bad News About Male Voters appeared first on SAVE – Working for fairness and equal opportunities for men.

Jennifer Newsom Just Lost the Male Vote for Democrats

Edward Bartlett — Wed, 15 Apr 2026 15:27:44 +0000

PRESS RELEASE

Contact: Henry Herrera

Telephone: +1-301-801-0608

Email: info@saveservices.org

Jennifer Newsom Just Lost the Male Vote for Democrats

WASHINGTON / April 16, 2026 – For months, liberal operatives have been urging Democratic candidates to stop saying nasty things about male voters. In particular, Democratic strategist James Carville has been sharply critical of Democrats who indulge in “future is female” and #MeToo sloganeering (1).

And he seemed to be making progress…until last week.

That’s when a slew of media articles appeared that recounted over-the-top statements made by Jennifer Siebel Newsom, wife of California governor Gavin Newsom. Gavin Newsom is the leading Democratic candidate to run for president in 2028.

Below are some of Jennifer’s head-scratching statements about gender relations in America:

Professional Victim: Jennifer Newsom, who lives in a palatial $9 million estate, had no qualms in making the bizarre claim that, “The gender hierarchy is the oldest form of oppression. It’s the roots of oppression and it’s the template for all other oppression.” (2)

Female Chauvinist: “Every problem that we have in society right now will be fixed” when “more women are in the rooms making decisions, changing the status quo, and transforming not just our just culture but our society and our economy.” (3)

Patriarchy vs. Matriarchy: In her The Mask You Live In documentary, Newsom critiques “toxic masculinity” and “patriarchal” structures (4). But many persons dispute the notion that “patriarchal” structures exist, and argue the real concern is the emergence of powerful matriarchies, often referred to as the “Great Feminization.” (5)

Alt-Right Boogeyman: The California First Partner insists that boys are being influenced by an “alt-right socialization” that she believes are “very, very dangerous.” (6) Mrs. Newsom admitted that “I’ve given our boys dolls, even if they tear the head off.” The woman doesn’t seem to realize that decapitating dolls’ heads reveals the utter disgust of boys who are being coerced into incompatible gender roles.

NGO Profiteer: Jennifer Newsom runs the Representation Project, a charity that claims to be fighting “intersectional gender stereotypes.” According to a Daily Mail article, “The organization brings in between $1 million and $1.7 million a year in grants and donations, with roughly $300,000 of it going straight to her and her company in recent years, according to financial records.” (7)

Matt Walsh offered these cogent remarks about Jennifer Siebel Newsom:

“She’s the perfect feminist. Not only because she’s constantly out babbling about how men are evil, but also because her husband is trying to achieve something great (becoming president), and she is determined to put herself at the center of the story and absolutely destroy his dream in the process….A very instructive cautionary tale for young men. Never marry a feminist. She will ruin your life. Guaranteed.” (8)

SAVE – Stop Abusive and Violent Environments – is a 501(c)3 organization working to assure due process, fairness, and equal opportunities for men.

Links:

The post Jennifer Newsom Just Lost the Male Vote for Democrats appeared first on SAVE – Working for fairness and equal opportunities for men.