<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Stalking Archives - Save - Leading The Policy Movement For Fairness and Due Process On Campus</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.saveservices.org/category/stalking/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.saveservices.org/category/stalking/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Jan 2022 13:56:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>Appellate Judge Issues Ground-Breaking Title IX Decision Against UCLA</title>
		<link>https://www.saveservices.org/2022/01/appellate-judge-issues-ground-breaking-title-ix-decision-against-ucla/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Edward Bartlett]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Jan 2022 13:56:02 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Due Process]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sexual Assault]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sexual Harassment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stalking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Title IX]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.saveservices.org/?p=4246</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>PRESS RELEASE Rebecca Stewart: 513-479-3335 Email: info@saveservices.org Appellate Judge Issues Ground-Breaking Title IX Decision Against UCLA WASHINGTON / January 14, 2022 – In a groundbreaking decision, the 9th Circuit Court reversed and remanded a California district court’s decision to dismiss a graduate student’s Title IX claims against the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA). The [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.saveservices.org/2022/01/appellate-judge-issues-ground-breaking-title-ix-decision-against-ucla/">Appellate Judge Issues Ground-Breaking Title IX Decision Against UCLA</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.saveservices.org">Save - Leading The Policy Movement For Fairness and Due Process On Campus</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>PRESS RELEASE</em></p>
<p>Rebecca Stewart: 513-479-3335</p>
<p>Email: <a href="mailto:info@saveservices.org">info@saveservices.org</a></p>
<p><strong>Appellate Judge Issues Ground-Breaking Title IX Decision Against UCLA</strong></p>
<p>WASHINGTON / January 14, 2022 – In a groundbreaking decision, the 9th Circuit Court reversed and remanded a California district court’s decision to dismiss a graduate student’s Title IX claims against the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA). The <em>John Doe v. Regents of the University of California</em> decision was issued by Judge Consuelo Callahan on January 11.<a href="#_ftn1" name="_ftnref1">[1]</a> This was the first time in California that a federal Title IX case brought by an accused student has survived a motion to dismiss.</p>
<p>In 2017, Jane Roe filed a Title IX complaint against John Doe alleging 13 instances of sexual misconduct, including dating violence, sexual assault, and stalking. Despite the many discrepancies in Roe’s story, UCLA’s Title IX hearing committee ruled in favor of Roe, resulting in the suspension of Doe for two years.<a href="#_ftn2" name="_ftnref2">[2]</a></p>
<p>Doe brought suit against UCLA in the Central District of California, alleging the university violated Title IX during a Title IX Investigation and disciplinary proceeding. The District Court of the Central District of California granted UCLA’s motion to dismiss Doe’s Title IX claims, ruling that Doe failed to show that sex-bias was a motivating factor in initiating proceedings against him.<a href="#_ftn3" name="_ftnref3">[3]</a></p>
<p>To survive a motion to dismiss a Title IX claim, the court in<em> Schwake v. Arizona Board of Regents</em>,<a href="#_ftn4" name="_ftnref4">[4]</a> clarified the pleading standard for Title IX claims. Specifically, a plaintiff only must provide “<em>enough facts </em>to state a claim for relief that is plausible on its face,<a href="#_ftn5" name="_ftnref5">[5]</a>” and “[s]ex discrimination need not be the only plausible explanation or even the most plausible explanation for a Title IX claim to proceed[.]”<a href="#_ftn6" name="_ftnref6">[6]</a></p>
<p>Based on the <em>Schwake </em>standard, Judge Callahan concluded that “Doe’s allegations of external pressures [through the Dear Colleague Letter] and an internal pattern and practice of bias [among UCLA Title IX Investigators], along with allegations concerning his particular disciplinary case, give rise to a plausible inference that the University discriminated against Doe on the basis of sex.”<a href="#_ftn7" name="_ftnref7">[7]</a></p>
<p>Mark Hathaway, counsel for the plaintiff, noted that this decision was a victory for those fighting against institutional sex bias:</p>
<p style="padding-left: 40px;">“Today the court acknowledged that biased assumptions against male students and the procedural irregularities in UCLA Title IX campus enforcement, all disfavoring accused male students, show an unacceptable pattern and practice of gender bias at the University of California.  The ruling allows John Doe to renew his effort to hold UCLA accountable for what was done to him and to stop UCLA from harming other students regardless of gender.”</p>
<p>This marks the 45<sup>th</sup> judicial decision against colleges in which judges found illegal sex discrimination against male students.<a href="#_ftn8" name="_ftnref8">[8]</a> Many students who have successfully overturned Title IX disciplinary decisions in state court will now be able to seek damages in federal court for the sex discrimination they faced in the campus process.</p>
<p><em>Citations:</em></p>
<p><a href="#_ftnref1" name="_ftn1">[1]</a> <em>Doe v. Regents of the University of California</em>, No. 20-55831, at *6 (9th Cir. 2022). <a href="https://cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2022/01/11/20-55831.pdf">https://cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2022/01/11/20-55831.pdf</a></p>
<p><a href="#_ftnref2" name="_ftn2">[2]</a> <em>Id.</em> at *8.</p>
<p><a href="#_ftnref3" name="_ftn3">[3]</a> <em>Id.</em> at *9.</p>
<p><a href="#_ftnref4" name="_ftn4">[4]</a> 967 F.3d 940 (9th Cir. 2020).</p>
<p><a href="#_ftnref5" name="_ftn5">[5]</a> <em>Id.</em> at 947.</p>
<p><a href="#_ftnref6" name="_ftn6">[6]</a> <em>Id.</em> at 948.</p>
<p><a href="#_ftnref7" name="_ftn7">[7]</a> <em>Doe v. Regents of the University of California</em>, at *23.</p>
<p><a href="#_ftnref8" name="_ftn8">[8]</a> <a href="https://www.saveservices.org/title-ix-regulation/analysis-of-judicial-decisions/">https://www.saveservices.org/title-ix-regulation/analysis-of-judicial-decisions/</a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.saveservices.org/2022/01/appellate-judge-issues-ground-breaking-title-ix-decision-against-ucla/">Appellate Judge Issues Ground-Breaking Title IX Decision Against UCLA</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.saveservices.org">Save - Leading The Policy Movement For Fairness and Due Process On Campus</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Title IX Regulatory Text — 34 CFR 106</title>
		<link>https://www.saveservices.org/2020/05/new-title-ix-regulatory-text-34-cfr-106/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[saveadmin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 May 2020 04:58:51 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Campus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Department of Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Office for Civil Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sexual Assault]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sexual Harassment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stalking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Title IX]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.saveservices.org/?p=472</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>PART 106—NONDISCRIMINATION ON THE BASIS OF SEX IN EDUCATION PROGRAMS OR ACTIVITIES RECEIVING FEDERAL FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE 1. The authority citation for part 106 continues to read as follows: Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1681 et seq., unless otherwise noted. 2. Section 106.3 is amended by revising paragraph (a) to read as follows: §106.3 Remedial and affirmative action</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.saveservices.org/2020/05/new-title-ix-regulatory-text-34-cfr-106/">Title IX Regulatory Text — 34 CFR 106</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.saveservices.org">Save - Leading The Policy Movement For Fairness and Due Process On Campus</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="vc_row wpb_row vc_row-fluid"><div class="wpb_column vc_column_container vc_col-sm-12"><div class="vc_column-inner"><div class="wpb_wrapper">
	<div class="wpb_text_column wpb_content_element " >
		<div class="wpb_wrapper">
			<div class="post-content">
<p><strong>PART 106—NONDISCRIMINATION ON THE BASIS OF SEX IN EDUCATION </strong><strong>PROGRAMS OR ACTIVITIES RECEIVING FEDERAL FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE</strong></p>
<p>1. The authority citation for part 106 continues to read as follows:<br />
Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1681 et seq., unless otherwise noted.</p>
<p>2. Section 106.3 is amended by revising paragraph (a) to read as follows:</p>
<p><em>§106.3 Remedial and affirmative action and self-evaluation.</em></p>
<p>(a) Remedial action. If the Assistant Secretary finds that a recipient has discriminated<br />
against persons on the basis of sex in an education program or activity under this part, or<br />
otherwise violated this part, such recipient must take such remedial action as the Assistant<br />
Secretary deems necessary to remedy the violation, consistent with 20 U.S.C. 1682.</p>
<p>* * * * *</p>
<p>3. Section 106.6 is amended by revising the section heading and adding paragraphs (d),<br />
(e), (f), (g), and (h) to read as follows:<br />
<em>§ 106.6 Effect of other requirements and preservation of rights.</em></p>
<p>* * * * *</p>
<p>(d) Constitutional protections. Nothing in this part requires a recipient to:<br />
(1) Restrict any rights that would otherwise be protected from government action by the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution;<br />
(2) Deprive a person of any rights that would otherwise be protected from government action under the Due Process Clauses of the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments of the U.S. Constitution; or<br />
(3) Restrict any other rights guaranteed against government action by the U.S.<br />
Constitution.<br />
(e) Effect of Section 444 of General Education Provisions Act (GEPA)/Family<br />
Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA). The obligation to comply with this part is not<br />
obviated or alleviated by the FERPA statute, 20 U.S.C. 1232g, or FERPA regulations, 34 CFR<br />
part 99.<br />
(f) Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Nothing in this part may be read in derogation<br />
of any individual’s rights under title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. 2000e et seq.<br />
or any regulations promulgated thereunder.<br />
(g) Exercise of rights by parents or guardians. Nothing in this part may be read in<br />
derogation of any legal right of a parent or guardian to act on behalf of a “complainant,”<br />
“respondent,” “party,” or other individual, subject to paragraph (e) of this section, including but<br />
not limited to filing a formal complaint.<br />
(h) Preemptive effect. To the extent of a conflict between State or local law and title IX as<br />
implemented by §§ 106.30, 106.44, and 106.45, the obligation to comply with §§ 106.30, 106.44,<br />
and 106.45 is not obviated or alleviated by any State or local law.</p>
<p>*****</p>
<p>4. Section 106.8 is revised to read as follows:<br />
<em>§ 106.8 Designation of coordinator, dissemination of policy, and adoption of grievance</em><br />
<em>procedures.</em><br />
(a) Designation of coordinator. Each recipient must designate and authorize at least one<br />
employee to coordinate its efforts to comply with its responsibilities under this part, which<br />
employee must be referred to as the “Title IX Coordinator.” The recipient must notify applicants<br />
for admission and employment, students, parents or legal guardians of elementary and secondary<br />
school students, employees, and all unions or professional organizations holding collective<br />
bargaining or professional agreements with the recipient, of the name or title, office address,<br />
electronic mail address, and telephone number of the employee or employees designated as the<br />
Title IX Coordinator pursuant to this paragraph. Any person may report sex discrimination,<br />
including sexual harassment (whether or not the person reporting is the person alleged to be the<br />
victim of conduct that could constitute sex discrimination or sexual harassment), in person, by<br />
mail, by telephone, or by electronic mail, using the contact information listed for the Title IX<br />
Coordinator, or by any other means that results in the Title IX Coordinator receiving the person’s<br />
verbal or written report. Such a report may be made at any time (including during non-business<br />
hours) by using the telephone number or electronic mail address, or by mail to the office address,<br />
listed for the Title IX Coordinator.<br />
(b) Dissemination of policy—(1) Notification of policy. Each recipient must notify<br />
persons entitled to a notification under paragraph (a) of this section that the recipient does not<br />
discriminate on the basis of sex in the education program or activity that it operates, and that it is<br />
required by title IX and this part not to discriminate in such a manner. Such notification must<br />
state that the requirement not to discriminate in the education program or activity extends to<br />
admission (unless subpart C of this part does not apply) and employment, and that inquiries<br />
about the application of title IX and this part to such recipient may be referred to the recipient’s<br />
Title IX Coordinator, to the Assistant Secretary, or both.<br />
(2) Publications. (i) Each recipient must prominently display the contact information<br />
required to be listed for the Title IX Coordinator under paragraph (a) of this section and the<br />
policy described in paragraph (b)(1) of this section on its website, if any, and in each handbook<br />
or catalog that it makes available to persons entitled to a notification under paragraph (a) of this<br />
section.<br />
(ii) A recipient must not use or distribute a publication stating that the recipient treats<br />
applicants, students, or employees differently on the basis of sex except as such treatment is<br />
permitted by title IX or this part.<br />
(c) Adoption of grievance procedures. A recipient must adopt and publish grievance<br />
procedures that provide for the prompt and equitable resolution of student and employee<br />
complaints alleging any action that would be prohibited by this part and a grievance process that<br />
complies with § 106.45 for formal complaints as defined in § 106.30. A recipient must provide to<br />
persons entitled to a notification under paragraph (a) of this section notice of the recipient’s<br />
grievance procedures and grievance process, including how to report or file a complaint of sex<br />
discrimination, how to report or file a formal complaint of sexual harassment, and how the<br />
recipient will respond.<br />
(d) Application outside the United States. The requirements of paragraph (c) of this<br />
section apply only to sex discrimination occurring against a person in the United States.<br />
5. Section 106.9 is revised to read as follows:<br />
§ 106.9 Severability.<br />
If any provision of this subpart or its application to any person, act, or practice is held<br />
invalid, the remainder of the subpart or the application of its provisions to any person, act, or<br />
practice shall not be affected thereby.</p>
<p>6. Section 106.12 is amended by revising paragraph (b) to read as follows:<br />
<em>§ 106.12 Educational institutions controlled by religious organizations.</em></p>
<p>* * * * *</p>
<p>(b) Assurance of exemption. An educational institution that seeks assurance of the<br />
exemption set forth in paragraph (a) of this section may do so by submitting in writing to the<br />
Assistant Secretary a statement by the highest ranking official of the institution, identifying the<br />
provisions of this part that conflict with a specific tenet of the religious organization. An<br />
institution is not required to seek assurance from the Assistant Secretary in order to assert such<br />
an exemption. In the event the Department notifies an institution that it is under investigation for<br />
noncompliance with this part and the institution wishes to assert an exemption set forth in<br />
paragraph (a) of this section, the institution may at that time raise its exemption by submitting in<br />
writing to the Assistant Secretary a statement by the highest ranking official of the institution,<br />
identifying the provisions of this part which conflict with a specific tenet of the religious<br />
organization, whether or not the institution had previously sought assurance of an exemption<br />
from the Assistant Secretary.</p>
<p>* * * * *</p>
<p>7. Add § 106.18 to subpart B to read as follows:<br />
<em>§ 106.18 Severability.</em><br />
If any provision of this subpart or its application to any person, act, or practice is held<br />
invalid, the remainder of the subpart or the application of its provisions to any person, act, or<br />
practice shall not be affected thereby.</p>
<p>8. Add § 106.24 to subpart C to read as follows:<br />
<em>§ 106.24 Severability.</em><br />
If any provision of this subpart or its application to any person, act, or practice is held<br />
invalid, the remainder of the subpart or the application of its provisions to any person, act, or<br />
practice shall not be affected thereby.<br />
9. Add § 106.30 to subpart D to read as follows:</p>
<p><em>§ 106.30 Definitions.</em><br />
(a) As used in this part:<br />
Actual knowledge means notice of sexual harassment or allegations of sexual harassment<br />
to a recipient’s Title IX Coordinator or any official of the recipient who has authority to institute<br />
corrective measures on behalf of the recipient, or to any employee of an elementary and<br />
secondary school. Imputation of knowledge based solely on vicarious liability or constructive<br />
notice is insufficient to constitute actual knowledge. This standard is not met when the only<br />
official of the recipient with actual knowledge is the respondent. The mere ability or obligation<br />
to report sexual harassment or to inform a student about how to report sexual harassment, or<br />
having been trained to do so, does not qualify an individual as one who has authority to institute<br />
corrective measures on behalf of the recipient. “Notice” as used in this paragraph includes, but is<br />
not limited to, a report of sexual harassment to the Title IX Coordinator as described in §<br />
106.8(a).<br />
Complainant means an individual who is alleged to be the victim of conduct that could<br />
constitute sexual harassment.<br />
Consent. The Assistant Secretary will not require recipients to adopt a particular<br />
definition of consent with respect to sexual assault, as referenced in this section.<br />
Formal complaint means a document filed by a complainant or signed by the Title IX<br />
Coordinator alleging sexual harassment against a respondent and requesting that the recipient<br />
investigate the allegation of sexual harassment. At the time of filing a formal complaint, a<br />
complainant must be participating in or attempting to participate in the education program or<br />
activity of the recipient with which the formal complaint is filed. A formal complaint may be<br />
filed with the Title IX Coordinator in person, by mail, or by electronic mail, by using the contact<br />
information required to be listed for the Title IX Coordinator under § 106.8(a), and by any<br />
additional method designated by the recipient. As used in this paragraph, the phrase “document<br />
filed by a complainant” means a document or electronic submission (such as by electronic mail<br />
or through an online portal provided for this purpose by the recipient) that contains the<br />
complainant’s physical or digital signature, or otherwise indicates that the complainant is the<br />
person filing the formal complaint. Where the Title IX Coordinator signs a formal complaint, the<br />
Title IX Coordinator is not a complainant or otherwise a party under this part or under § 106.45,<br />
and must comply with the requirements of this part, including § 106.45(b)(1)(iii).<br />
Respondent means an individual who has been reported to be the perpetrator of conduct<br />
that could constitute sexual harassment.<br />
Sexual harassment means conduct on the basis of sex that satisfies one or more of the<br />
following:<br />
(1) An employee of the recipient conditioning the provision of an aid, benefit, or service<br />
of the recipient on an individual’s participation in unwelcome sexual conduct;<br />
(2) Unwelcome conduct determined by a reasonable person to be so severe, pervasive,<br />
and objectively offensive that it effectively denies a person equal access to the recipient’s<br />
education program or activity; or<br />
(3) “Sexual assault” as defined in 20 U.S.C. 1092(f)(6)(A)(v), “dating violence” as<br />
defined in 34 U.S.C. 12291(a)(10), “domestic violence” as defined in 34 U.S.C. 12291(a)(8), or<br />
“stalking” as defined in 34 U.S.C. 12291(a)(30).<br />
Supportive measures means non-disciplinary, non-punitive individualized services<br />
offered as appropriate, as reasonably available, and without fee or charge to the complainant or<br />
the respondent before or after the filing of a formal complaint or where no formal complaint has<br />
been filed. Such measures are designed to restore or preserve equal access to the recipient’s<br />
education program or activity without unreasonably burdening the other party, including<br />
measures designed to protect the safety of all parties or the recipient’s educational environment,<br />
or deter sexual harassment. Supportive measures may include counseling, extensions of<br />
deadlines or other course-related adjustments, modifications of work or class schedules, campus<br />
escort services, mutual restrictions on contact between the parties, changes in work or housing<br />
locations, leaves of absence, increased security and monitoring of certain areas of the campus,<br />
and other similar measures. The recipient must maintain as confidential any supportive measures<br />
provided to the complainant or respondent, to the extent that maintaining such confidentiality<br />
would not impair the ability of the recipient to provide the supportive measures. The Title IX<br />
Coordinator is responsible for coordinating the effective implementation of supportive<br />
measures.<br />
(b) As used in §§ 106.44 and 106.45:<br />
Elementary and secondary school means a local educational agency (LEA), as defined in<br />
the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965, as amended by the Every Student<br />
Succeeds Act, a preschool, or a private elementary or secondary school.<br />
Postsecondary institution means an institution of graduate higher education as defined in<br />
§ 106.2(l), an institution of undergraduate higher education as defined in § 106.2(m), an<br />
institution of professional education as defined in § 106.2(n), or an institution of vocational<br />
education as defined in § 106.2(o).<br />
10. Add § 106.44 to subpart D to read as follows:<br />
§ 106.44 Recipient’s response to sexual harassment.<br />
(a) General response to sexual harassment. A recipient with actual knowledge of sexual<br />
harassment in an education program or activity of the recipient against a person in the United<br />
States, must respond promptly in a manner that is not deliberately indifferent. A recipient is<br />
deliberately indifferent only if its response to sexual harassment is clearly unreasonable in light<br />
of the known circumstances. For the purposes of this section, §§ 106.30, and 106.45, “education<br />
program or activity” includes locations, events, or circumstances over which the recipient<br />
exercised substantial control over both the respondent and the context in which the sexual<br />
harassment occurs, and also includes any building owned or controlled by a student organization<br />
that is officially recognized by a postsecondary institution. A recipient’s response must treat<br />
complainants and respondents equitably by offering supportive measures as defined in § 106.30<br />
to a complainant, and by following a grievance process that complies with § 106.45 before the<br />
imposition of any disciplinary sanctions or other actions that are not supportive measures as<br />
defined in § 106.30, against a respondent. The Title IX Coordinator must promptly contact the<br />
complainant to discuss the availability of supportive measures as defined in § 106.30, consider<br />
the complainant’s wishes with respect to supportive measures, inform the complainant of the<br />
availability of supportive measures with or without the filing of a formal complaint, and explain<br />
to the complainant the process for filing a formal complaint. The Department may not deem a<br />
recipient to have satisfied the recipient’s duty to not be deliberately indifferent under this part<br />
based on the recipient’s restriction of rights protected under the U.S. Constitution, including the<br />
First Amendment, Fifth Amendment, and Fourteenth Amendment.<br />
(b) Response to a formal complaint. (1) In response to a formal complaint, a recipient<br />
must follow a grievance process that complies with § 106.45. With or without a formal<br />
complaint, a recipient must comply with § 106.44(a).<br />
(2) The Assistant Secretary will not deem a recipient’s determination regarding<br />
responsibility to be evidence of deliberate indifference by the recipient, or otherwise evidence of<br />
discrimination under title IX by the recipient, solely because the Assistant Secretary would have<br />
reached a different determination based on an independent weighing of the evidence.<br />
(c) Emergency removal. Nothing in this part precludes a recipient from removing a<br />
respondent from the recipient’s education program or activity on an emergency basis, provided<br />
that the recipient undertakes an individualized safety and risk analysis, determines that an<br />
immediate threat to the physical health or safety of any student or other individual arising from<br />
the allegations of sexual harassment justifies removal, and provides the respondent with notice<br />
and an opportunity to challenge the decision immediately following the removal. This provision<br />
may not be construed to modify any rights under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act,<br />
Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, or the Americans with Disabilities Act.<br />
(d) Administrative leave. Nothing in this subpart precludes a recipient from placing a<br />
non-student employee respondent on administrative leave during the pendency of a grievance<br />
process that complies with § 106.45. This provision may not be construed to modify any rights<br />
under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 or the Americans with Disabilities Act.<br />
11. Add § 106.45 to subpart D to read as follows:<br />
§ 106.45 Grievance process for formal complaints of sexual harassment.<br />
(a) Discrimination on the basis of sex. A recipient’s treatment of a complainant or a<br />
respondent in response to a formal complaint of sexual harassment may constitute discrimination<br />
on the basis of sex under title IX.<br />
(b) Grievance process. For the purpose of addressing formal complaints of sexual<br />
harassment, a recipient’s grievance process must comply with the requirements of this section.<br />
Any provisions, rules, or practices other than those required by this section that a recipient<br />
adopts as part of its grievance process for handling formal complaints of sexual harassment as<br />
defined in § 106.30, must apply equally to both parties.<br />
(1) Basic requirements for grievance process. A recipient’s grievance process must—<br />
(i) Treat complainants and respondents equitably by providing remedies to a complainant<br />
where a determination of responsibility for sexual harassment has been made against the<br />
respondent, and by following a grievance process that complies with this section before the<br />
imposition of any disciplinary sanctions or other actions that are not supportive measures as<br />
defined in § 106.30, against a respondent. Remedies must be designed to restore or preserve<br />
equal access to the recipient’s education program or activity. Such remedies may include the<br />
same individualized services described in § 106.30 as “supportive measures”; however, remedies<br />
need not be non-disciplinary or non-punitive and need not avoid burdening the respondent;<br />
(ii) Require an objective evaluation of all relevant evidence – including both inculpatory<br />
and exculpatory evidence – and provide that credibility determinations may not be based on a<br />
person’s status as a complainant, respondent, or witness;<br />
(iii) Require that any individual designated by a recipient as a Title IX Coordinator,<br />
investigator, decision-maker, or any person designated by a recipient to facilitate an informal<br />
resolution process, not have a conflict of interest or bias for or against complainants or<br />
respondents generally or an individual complainant or respondent. A recipient must ensure that<br />
Title IX Coordinators, investigators, decision-makers, and any person who facilitates an informal<br />
resolution process, receive training on the definition of sexual harassment in § 106.30, the scope<br />
of the recipient’s education program or activity, how to conduct an investigation and grievance<br />
process including hearings, appeals, and informal resolution processes, as applicable, and how to<br />
serve impartially, including by avoiding prejudgment of the facts at issue, conflicts of interest,<br />
and bias. A recipient must ensure that decision-makers receive training on any technology to be<br />
used at a live hearing and on issues of relevance of questions and evidence, including when<br />
questions and evidence about the complainant’s sexual predisposition or prior sexual behavior<br />
are not relevant, as set forth in paragraph (b)(6) of this section. A recipient also must ensure that<br />
investigators receive training on issues of relevance to create an investigative report that fairly<br />
summarizes relevant evidence, as set forth in paragraph (b)(5)(vii) of this section. Any materials<br />
used to train Title IX Coordinators, investigators, decision-makers, and any person who<br />
facilitates an informal resolution process, must not rely on sex stereotypes and must promote<br />
impartial investigations and adjudications of formal complaints of sexual harassment;<br />
(iv) Include a presumption that the respondent is not responsible for the alleged conduct<br />
until a determination regarding responsibility is made at the conclusion of the grievance process;<br />
(v) Include reasonably prompt time frames for conclusion of the grievance process,<br />
including reasonably prompt time frames for filing and resolving appeals and informal resolution<br />
processes if the recipient offers informal resolution processes, and a process that allows for the<br />
temporary delay of the grievance process or the limited extension of time frames for good cause<br />
with written notice to the complainant and the respondent of the delay or extension and the<br />
reasons for the action. Good cause may include considerations such as the absence of a party, a<br />
party’s advisor, or a witness; concurrent law enforcement activity; or the need for language<br />
assistance or accommodation of disabilities;<br />
(vi) Describe the range of possible disciplinary sanctions and remedies or list the possible<br />
disciplinary sanctions and remedies that the recipient may implement following any<br />
determination of responsibility;<br />
(vii) State whether the standard of evidence to be used to determine responsibility is the<br />
preponderance of the evidence standard or the clear and convincing evidence standard, apply the<br />
same standard of evidence for formal complaints against students as for formal complaints<br />
against employees, including faculty, and apply the same standard of evidence to all formal<br />
complaints of sexual harassment;<br />
(viii) Include the procedures and permissible bases for the complainant and respondent to<br />
appeal;<br />
(ix) Describe the range of supportive measures available to complainants and<br />
respondents; and<br />
(x) Not require, allow, rely upon, or otherwise use questions or evidence that constitute,<br />
or seek disclosure of, information protected under a legally recognized privilege, unless the<br />
person holding such privilege has waived the privilege.<br />
(2) Notice of allegations—(i) Upon receipt of a formal complaint, a recipient must<br />
provide the following written notice to the parties who are known:<br />
(A) Notice of the recipient’s grievance process that complies with this section, including<br />
any informal resolution process.<br />
(B) Notice of the allegations of sexual harassment potentially constituting sexual<br />
harassment as defined in § 106.30, including sufficient details known at the time and with<br />
sufficient time to prepare a response before any initial interview. Sufficient details include the<br />
identities of the parties involved in the incident, if known, the conduct allegedly constituting<br />
sexual harassment under § 106.30, and the date and location of the alleged incident, if known.<br />
The written notice must include a statement that the respondent is presumed not responsible for<br />
the alleged conduct and that a determination regarding responsibility is made at the conclusion of<br />
the grievance process. The written notice must inform the parties that they may have an advisor<br />
of their choice, who may be, but is not required to be, an attorney, under paragraph (b)(5)(iv) of<br />
this section, and may inspect and review evidence under paragraph (b)(5)(vi) of this section. The<br />
written notice must inform the parties of any provision in the recipient’s code of conduct that<br />
prohibits knowingly making false statements or knowingly submitting false information during<br />
the grievance process.<br />
(ii) If, in the course of an investigation, the recipient decides to investigate allegations<br />
about the complainant or respondent that are not included in the notice provided pursuant to<br />
paragraph (b)(2)(i)(B) of this section, the recipient must provide notice of the additional<br />
allegations to the parties whose identities are known.<br />
(3) Dismissal of a formal complaint—(i) The recipient must investigate the allegations in<br />
a formal complaint. If the conduct alleged in the formal complaint would not constitute sexual<br />
harassment as defined in § 106.30 even if proved, did not occur in the recipient’s education<br />
program or activity, or did not occur against a person in the United States, then the recipient<br />
must dismiss the formal complaint with regard to that conduct for purposes of sexual harassment<br />
under title IX or this part; such a dismissal does not preclude action under another provision of<br />
the recipient’s code of conduct.<br />
(ii) The recipient may dismiss the formal complaint or any allegations therein, if at any<br />
time during the investigation or hearing: a complainant notifies the Title IX Coordinator in<br />
writing that the complainant would like to withdraw the formal complaint or any allegations<br />
therein; the respondent is no longer enrolled or employed by the recipient; or specific<br />
circumstances prevent the recipient from gathering evidence sufficient to reach a determination<br />
as to the formal complaint or allegations therein.<br />
(iii) Upon a dismissal required or permitted pursuant to paragraph (b)(3)(i) or (b)(3)(ii) of<br />
this section, the recipient must promptly send written notice of the dismissal and reason(s)<br />
therefor simultaneously to the parties.<br />
(4) Consolidation of formal complaints. A recipient may consolidate formal complaints<br />
as to allegations of sexual harassment against more than one respondent, or by more than one<br />
complainant against one or more respondents, or by one party against the other party, where the<br />
allegations of sexual harassment arise out of the same facts or circumstances. Where a grievance<br />
process involves more than one complainant or more than one respondent, references in this<br />
section to the singular “party,” “complainant,” or “respondent” include the plural, as applicable.<br />
(5) Investigation of a formal complaint. When investigating a formal complaint and<br />
throughout the grievance process, a recipient must—<br />
(i) Ensure that the burden of proof and the burden of gathering evidence sufficient to<br />
reach a determination regarding responsibility rest on the recipient and not on the parties<br />
provided that the recipient cannot access, consider, disclose, or otherwise use a party’s records<br />
that are made or maintained by a physician, psychiatrist, psychologist, or other recognized<br />
professional or paraprofessional acting in the professional’s or paraprofessional’s capacity, or<br />
assisting in that capacity, and which are made and maintained in connection with the provision of<br />
treatment to the party, unless the recipient obtains that party’s voluntary, written consent to do so<br />
for a grievance process under this section (if a party is not an “eligible student,” as defined in 34<br />
CFR 99.3, then the recipient must obtain the voluntary, written consent of a “parent,” as defined<br />
in 34 CFR 99.3);<br />
(ii) Provide an equal opportunity for the parties to present witnesses, including fact and<br />
expert witnesses, and other inculpatory and exculpatory evidence;<br />
(iii) Not restrict the ability of either party to discuss the allegations under investigation or<br />
to gather and present relevant evidence;<br />
(iv) Provide the parties with the same opportunities to have others present during any<br />
grievance proceeding, including the opportunity to be accompanied to any related meeting or<br />
proceeding by the advisor of their choice, who may be, but is not required to be, an attorney, and<br />
not limit the choice or presence of advisor for either the complainant or respondent in any<br />
meeting or grievance proceeding; however, the recipient may establish restrictions regarding the<br />
extent to which the advisor may participate in the proceedings, as long as the restrictions apply<br />
equally to both parties;<br />
(v) Provide, to a party whose participation is invited or expected, written notice of the<br />
date, time, location, participants, and purpose of all hearings, investigative interviews, or other<br />
meetings, with sufficient time for the party to prepare to participate;<br />
(vi) Provide both parties an equal opportunity to inspect and review any evidence<br />
obtained as part of the investigation that is directly related to the allegations raised in a formal<br />
complaint, including the evidence upon which the recipient does not intend to rely in reaching a<br />
determination regarding responsibility and inculpatory or exculpatory evidence whether obtained<br />
from a party or other source, so that each party can meaningfully respond to the evidence prior to<br />
conclusion of the investigation. Prior to completion of the investigative report, the recipient must<br />
send to each party and the party’s advisor, if any, the evidence subject to inspection and review<br />
in an electronic format or a hard copy, and the parties must have at least 10 days to submit a<br />
written response, which the investigator will consider prior to completion of the investigative<br />
report. The recipient must make all such evidence subject to the parties’ inspection and review<br />
available at any hearing to give each party equal opportunity to refer to such evidence during the<br />
hearing, including for purposes of cross-examination; and<br />
(vii) Create an investigative report that fairly summarizes relevant evidence and, at least<br />
10 days prior to a hearing (if a hearing is required under this section or otherwise provided) or<br />
other time of determination regarding responsibility, send to each party and the party’s advisor, if<br />
any, the investigative report in an electronic format or a hard copy, for their review and written<br />
response.<br />
(6) Hearings. (i) For postsecondary institutions, the recipient’s grievance process must<br />
provide for a live hearing. At the live hearing, the decision-maker(s) must permit each party’s<br />
advisor to ask the other party and any witnesses all relevant questions and follow-up questions,<br />
including those challenging credibility. Such cross-examination at the live hearing must be<br />
conducted directly, orally, and in real time by the party’s advisor of choice and never by a party<br />
personally, notwithstanding the discretion of the recipient under paragraph (b)(5)(iv) of this<br />
section to otherwise restrict the extent to which advisors may participate in the proceedings. At<br />
the request of either party, the recipient must provide for the live hearing to occur with the<br />
parties located in separate rooms with technology enabling the decision-maker(s) and parties to<br />
simultaneously see and hear the party or the witness answering questions. Only relevant crossexamination and other questions may be asked of a party or witness. Before a complainant,<br />
respondent, or witness answers a cross-examination or other question, the decision-maker(s)<br />
must first determine whether the question is relevant and explain any decision to exclude a<br />
question as not relevant. If a party does not have an advisor present at the live hearing, the<br />
recipient must provide without fee or charge to that party, an advisor of the recipient’s choice,<br />
who may be, but is not required to be, an attorney, to conduct cross-examination on behalf of that<br />
party. Questions and evidence about the complainant’s sexual predisposition or prior sexual<br />
behavior are not relevant, unless such questions and evidence about the complainant’s prior<br />
sexual behavior are offered to prove that someone other than the respondent committed the<br />
conduct alleged by the complainant, or if the questions and evidence concern specific incidents<br />
of the complainant’s prior sexual behavior with respect to the respondent and are offered to<br />
prove consent. If a party or witness does not submit to cross-examination at the live hearing, the<br />
decision-maker(s) must not rely on any statement of that party or witness in reaching a<br />
determination regarding responsibility; provided, however, that the decision-maker(s) cannot<br />
draw an inference about the determination regarding responsibility based solely on a party’s or<br />
witness’s absence from the live hearing or refusal to answer cross-examination or other<br />
questions. Live hearings pursuant to this paragraph may be conducted with all parties physically<br />
present in the same geographic location or, at the recipient’s discretion, any or all parties,<br />
witnesses, and other participants may appear at the live hearing virtually, with technology<br />
enabling participants simultaneously to see and hear each other. Recipients must create an audio<br />
or audiovisual recording, or transcript, of any live hearing and make it available to the parties for<br />
inspection and review.<br />
(ii) For recipients that are elementary and secondary schools, and other recipients that are<br />
not postsecondary institutions, the recipient’s grievance process may, but need not, provide for a<br />
hearing. With or without a hearing, after the recipient has sent the investigative report to the<br />
parties pursuant to paragraph (b)(5)(vii) of this section and before reaching a determination<br />
regarding responsibility, the decision-maker(s) must afford each party the opportunity to submit<br />
written, relevant questions that a party wants asked of any party or witness, provide each party<br />
with the answers, and allow for additional, limited follow-up questions from each party. With or<br />
without a hearing, questions and evidence about the complainant’s sexual predisposition or prior<br />
sexual behavior are not relevant, unless such questions and evidence about the complainant’s<br />
prior sexual behavior are offered to prove that someone other than the respondent committed the<br />
conduct alleged by the complainant, or if the questions and evidence concern specific incidents<br />
of the complainant’s prior sexual behavior with respect to the respondent and are offered to<br />
prove consent. The decision-maker(s) must explain to the party proposing the questions any<br />
decision to exclude a question as not relevant.<br />
(7) Determination regarding responsibility. (i) The decision-maker(s), who cannot be the<br />
same person(s) as the Title IX Coordinator or the investigator(s), must issue a written<br />
determination regarding responsibility. To reach this determination, the recipient must apply the<br />
standard of evidence described in paragraph (b)(1)(vii) of this section.<br />
(ii) The written determination must include—<br />
(A) Identification of the allegations potentially constituting sexual harassment as defined<br />
in § 106.30;<br />
2027<br />
(B) A description of the procedural steps taken from the receipt of the formal complaint<br />
through the determination, including any notifications to the parties, interviews with parties and<br />
witnesses, site visits, methods used to gather other evidence, and hearings held;<br />
(C) Findings of fact supporting the determination;<br />
(D) Conclusions regarding the application of the recipient’s code of conduct to the facts;<br />
(E) A statement of, and rationale for, the result as to each allegation, including a<br />
determination regarding responsibility, any disciplinary sanctions the recipient imposes on the<br />
respondent, and whether remedies designed to restore or preserve equal access to the recipient’s<br />
education program or activity will be provided by the recipient to the complainant; and<br />
(F) The recipient’s procedures and permissible bases for the complainant and respondent<br />
to appeal.<br />
(iii) The recipient must provide the written determination to the parties simultaneously.<br />
The determination regarding responsibility becomes final either on the date that the recipient<br />
provides the parties with the written determination of the result of the appeal, if an appeal is<br />
filed, or if an appeal is not filed, the date on which an appeal would no longer be considered<br />
timely.<br />
(iv) The Title IX Coordinator is responsible for effective implementation of any<br />
remedies.<br />
(8) Appeals. (i) A recipient must offer both parties an appeal from a determination<br />
regarding responsibility, and from a recipient’s dismissal of a formal complaint or any<br />
allegations therein, on the following bases:<br />
(A) Procedural irregularity that affected the outcome of the matter;<br />
(B) New evidence that was not reasonably available at the time the determination<br />
regarding responsibility or dismissal was made, that could affect the outcome of the matter; and<br />
(C) The Title IX Coordinator, investigator(s), or decision-maker(s) had a conflict of<br />
interest or bias for or against complainants or respondents generally or the individual<br />
complainant or respondent that affected the outcome of the matter.<br />
(ii) A recipient may offer an appeal equally to both parties on additional bases.<br />
(iii) As to all appeals, the recipient must:<br />
(A) Notify the other party in writing when an appeal is filed and implement appeal<br />
procedures equally for both parties;<br />
(B) Ensure that the decision-maker(s) for the appeal is not the same person as the<br />
decision-maker(s) that reached the determination regarding responsibility or dismissal, the<br />
investigator(s), or the Title IX Coordinator;<br />
(C) Ensure that the decision-maker(s) for the appeal complies with the standards set forth<br />
in paragraph (b)(1)(iii) of this section;<br />
(D) Give both parties a reasonable, equal opportunity to submit a written statement in<br />
support of, or challenging, the outcome;<br />
(E) Issue a written decision describing the result of the appeal and the rationale for the<br />
result; and<br />
(F) Provide the written decision simultaneously to both parties.<br />
(9) Informal resolution. A recipient may not require as a condition of enrollment or<br />
continuing enrollment, or employment or continuing employment, or enjoyment of any other<br />
right, waiver of the right to an investigation and adjudication of formal complaints of sexual<br />
harassment consistent with this section. Similarly, a recipient may not require the parties to<br />
participate in an informal resolution process under this section and may not offer an informal<br />
resolution process unless a formal complaint is filed. However, at any time prior to reaching a<br />
determination regarding responsibility the recipient may facilitate an informal resolution process,<br />
such as mediation, that does not involve a full investigation and adjudication, provided that the<br />
recipient –<br />
(i) Provides to the parties a written notice disclosing: the allegations, the requirements of<br />
the informal resolution process including the circumstances under which it precludes the parties<br />
from resuming a formal complaint arising from the same allegations, provided, however, that at<br />
any time prior to agreeing to a resolution, any party has the right to withdraw from the informal<br />
resolution process and resume the grievance process with respect to the formal complaint, and<br />
any consequences resulting from participating in the informal resolution process, including the<br />
records that will be maintained or could be shared;<br />
(ii) Obtains the parties’ voluntary, written consent to the informal resolution process; and<br />
(iii) Does not offer or facilitate an informal resolution process to resolve allegations that<br />
an employee sexually harassed a student.<br />
(10) Recordkeeping. (i) A recipient must maintain for a period of seven years records of –<br />
(A) Each sexual harassment investigation including any determination regarding<br />
responsibility and any audio or audiovisual recording or transcript required under paragraph<br />
(b)(6)(i) of this section, any disciplinary sanctions imposed on the respondent, and any remedies<br />
provided to the complainant designed to restore or preserve equal access to the recipient’s<br />
education program or activity;<br />
(B) Any appeal and the result therefrom;<br />
(C) Any informal resolution and the result therefrom; and<br />
(D) All materials used to train Title IX Coordinators, investigators, decision-makers, and<br />
any person who facilitates an informal resolution process. A recipient must make these training<br />
materials publicly available on its website, or if the recipient does not maintain a website the<br />
recipient must make these materials available upon request for inspection by members of the<br />
public.<br />
(ii) For each response required under § 106.44, a recipient must create, and maintain for a<br />
period of seven years, records of any actions, including any supportive measures, taken in<br />
response to a report or formal complaint of sexual harassment. In each instance, the recipient<br />
must document the basis for its conclusion that its response was not deliberately indifferent, and<br />
document that it has taken measures designed to restore or preserve equal access to the<br />
recipient’s education program or activity. If a recipient does not provide a complainant with<br />
supportive measures, then the recipient must document the reasons why such a response was not<br />
clearly unreasonable in light of the known circumstances. The documentation of certain bases or<br />
measures does not limit the recipient in the future from providing additional explanations or<br />
detailing additional measures taken.</p>
<p>12. Add § 106.46 to subpart D to read as follows:<br />
<em>§ 106.46 Severability.</em><br />
If any provision of this subpart or its application to any person, act, or practice is held<br />
invalid, the remainder of the subpart or the application of its provisions to any person, act, or<br />
practice shall not be affected thereby.</p>
<p>13. Add § 106.62 to subpart E to read as follows:<br />
<em>§ 106.62 Severability.</em><br />
If any provision of this subpart or its application to any person, act, or practice is held<br />
invalid, the remainder of the subpart or the application of its provisions to any person, act, or<br />
practice shall not be affected thereby.</p>
<p>14. Subpart F is revised to read as follows:<br />
<strong>Subpart F–Retaliation</strong><br />
Sec.<br />
106.71 Retaliation<br />
106.72 Severability</p>
<p><strong>Subpart F–Retaliation</strong></p>
<p><em>§ 106.71 Retaliation.</em><br />
(a) Retaliation prohibited. No recipient or other person may intimidate, threaten, coerce,<br />
or discriminate against any individual for the purpose of interfering with any right or privilege<br />
secured by title IX or this part, or because the individual has made a report or complaint,<br />
testified, assisted, or participated or refused to participate in any manner in an investigation,<br />
proceeding, or hearing under this part. Intimidation, threats, coercion, or discrimination,<br />
including charges against an individual for code of conduct violations that do not involve sex<br />
discrimination or sexual harassment, but arise out of the same facts or circumstances as a report<br />
or complaint of sex discrimination, or a report or formal complaint of sexual harassment, for the<br />
purpose of interfering with any right or privilege secured by title IX or this part, constitutes<br />
retaliation. The recipient must keep confidential the identity of any individual who has made a<br />
report or complaint of sex discrimination, including any individual who has made a report or<br />
filed a formal complaint of sexual harassment, any complainant, any individual who has been<br />
reported to be the perpetrator of sex discrimination, any respondent, and any witness, except as<br />
may be permitted by the FERPA statute, 20 U.S.C. 1232g, or FERPA regulations, 34 CFR part<br />
99, or as required by law, or to carry out the purposes of 34 CFR part 106, including the conduct<br />
of any investigation, hearing, or judicial proceeding arising thereunder. Complaints alleging<br />
retaliation may be filed according to the grievance procedures for sex discrimination required to<br />
be adopted under § 106.8(c).<br />
(b) Specific circumstances. (1) The exercise of rights protected under the First<br />
Amendment does not constitute retaliation prohibited under paragraph (a) of this section.<br />
(2) Charging an individual with a code of conduct violation for making a materially false<br />
statement in bad faith in the course of a grievance proceeding under this part does not constitute<br />
retaliation prohibited under paragraph (a) of this section, provided, however, that a determination<br />
regarding responsibility, alone, is not sufficient to conclude that any party made a materially<br />
false statement in bad faith.</p>
<p><em>§ 106.72 Severability.</em><br />
If any provision of this subpart or its application to any person, act, or practice is held<br />
invalid, the remainder of the subpart or the application of its provisions to any person, act, or<br />
practice shall not be affected thereby.</p>
<p>15. Add subpart G to read as follows:<br />
<strong>Subpart G – Procedures</strong><br />
Sec.<br />
106.81 Procedures<br />
106.82 Severability</p>
<p>Subpart G – Procedures<br />
<em>§ 106.81 Procedures.</em><br />
The procedural provisions applicable to title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 are<br />
hereby adopted and incorporated herein by reference. These procedures may be found at 34 CFR<br />
100.6-100.11 and 34 CFR part 101. The definitions in § 106.30 do not apply to 34 CFR 100.6-<br />
100.11 and 34 CFR part 101.</p>
<p><em>§ 106.82 Severability.</em><br />
If any provision of this subpart or its application to any person, act, or practice is held<br />
invalid, the remainder of the subpart or the application of its provisions to any person, act, or<br />
practice shall not be affected thereby.<br />
Subject Index to Title IX Preamble and Regulation [Removed]<br />
16. Remove the Subject Index to Title IX Preamble and Regulation.<br />
17. In addition to the amendments set forth above, in 34 CFR part 106, remove the<br />
parenthetical authority citation at the ends of §§ 106.1, 106.2, 106.3, 106.4, 106.5, 106.6, 106.7, ,<br />
106.11, 106.12, 106.13, 106.14, 106.15, 106.16, 106.17, 106.21, 106.22, 106.23, 106.31, 106.32,<br />
106.33, 106.34, 106.35, 106.36, 106.37, 106.38, 106.39, 106.40, 106.41, 106.42, 106.43, 106.51,<br />
106.52, 106.53, 106.54, 106.55, 106.56, 106.57, 106.58, 106.59, 106.60, and 106.61.</p>
<p>Source: https://www2.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ocr/docs/titleix-regs-unofficial.pdf , pages 2008-2033.</p>
</div>
<div class="fusion-meta-info"></div>

		</div>
	</div>
</div></div></div></div>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.saveservices.org/2020/05/new-title-ix-regulatory-text-34-cfr-106/">Title IX Regulatory Text — 34 CFR 106</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.saveservices.org">Save - Leading The Policy Movement For Fairness and Due Process On Campus</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
