May 162012
 

LETTERS:

Pass the GOP version of VAWA

By Gordon Finley

May 16, 2012

In a May 8 press release, the National Organization For Women condemned the Republican version of the Violence Against Women Act (VAWA), which was passed by the HouseJudiciary Committee on a mostly party-line vote.

Among other provisions, the Republican version provides greater protection and services for boys and men along with more inclusive “gender neutral” language than does the Democratic version, which presumes that only men are violent and only women are innocent victims (“Domestic-violence law advanced by House panel,” Web, May 8).

A few days before the vote, the Dallas Morning News and Dallas TV stations reported that a naked and blood-covered Cristal Paulette Richardson was charged with castrating and then murdering Cedric Lamont Owens by slitting his throat and stabbing him multiple times in the chest. In this heinous act Ms. Richardson joins at least three other women implicated in castration cases that received media attention: Lorena Bobbitt, Monju Bengum and Catherine Kieu Becker.

As the House girds for a floor vote on the Republican version of VAWA on Wednesday (and a likely showdown with the “War on Women” folks in both the House and Senate) I very much hope that all House members will be thinking about the Richardson case and what more they can do to protect boys and men from demonstrably violent girls and women.

GORDON E. FINLEY
Professor of Psychology Emeritus
Florida International University
Miami

Source: Washington Times

 

PRESS RELEASE

Contact: Teri Stoddard,
Telephone: 301-801-0608
Email: tstoddard@saveservices.org

Many Americans are Disenchanted with Violence Against Women Act:

SAVE Calls on Lawmakers to Heed Citizen Concerns

WASHINGTON / May 16, 2012 – A recent U.S. News poll found a strong majority of persons are opposed to the Violence Against Women Act (VAWA) in its current form. Featuring pro and con position statements by leading advocates and elected officials, the poll found that U.S. News readers reject the current VAWA law by a two-to-one margin: http://www.usnews.com/debate-club/should-the-violence-against-women-act-be-reauthorized

Laura Wood, a writer at TheThinkingHousewife.com, argued the “Violence Against Women Act is an egregious departure from justice and common sense.” Two out of three poll responders agreed with Wood’s critique.

More remarkable were the responses to the statement of Janice Crouse of Concerned Women for America. About 80% of respondents agreed with Crouse’s contention that VAWA “victimizes both women and men while building a feminist power structure.” Only 20% disagreed with her view.

Seizing the other side of the debate was Deborah Tucker, director of the National Center on Domestic and Sexual Violence, who claimed the “Violence Against Women Act must be reauthorized because it is working.” Readers roundly rejected that line of reasoning, with 1530 persons opposed and only 803 in favor.

U.S. News readers did not appear to be swayed by consideration of partisan politics. Democratic senator Max Baucus (MT) and Republican senator John Cornyn (TX) both argued in favor of VAWA’s reauthorization. But over two-thirds of survey respondents rejected the senators’ positions.

Least popular was the position taken by Delaware attorney general Joseph Biden, son of vice president Joe Biden. Only 22% of respondents agreed with Biden’s stance that the Violence Against Women Act should be reauthorized in its current form.

Over 2,400 persons participated in the online poll. While the U.S. News poll respondents likely are not representative of the American population, it does represent the largest survey of its kind ever conducted.

“Lawmakers need to pay heed to the views of average Americans, not the shrill claims of industry advocates,” notes SAVE spokesman Philip W. Cook. “In this election year, many men and women have witnessed first-hand the harmful effects of an out-of-control abuse industry. Voters will be satisfied with nothing less than reforms that bring a halt to the widespread waste and fraud.”

Stop Abusive and Violent Environments supports the reauthorization of VAWA, provided key reforms are included in the new law.

Stop Abusive and Violent Environments is a victim-advocacy organization working for evidence-based solutions to partner abuse: www.saveservices.org

 

Charges Dropped Against Man Who Served 20 Years for Rape

Christian Farr

May 16, 2012

Lake County prosecutors on Tuesday dropped sexual assault charges against a man accused in a decades-old Waukegan rape.

“I’m feeling great,” said Bennie Starks. “The fight is not over yet. We still have one more hurdle, but it’s a great day.”

Starks, convicted in 1986 of assaulting a 68-year-old woman, had served 20 years of a 60-year sentence when DNA evidence was retrieved that excluded him from the crime.

An appeals court ordered a new trial in 2006, and Starks was released on bond.

The State’s Attorney had previously threatened to retry Starks on the charges but on Tuesday dismissed the sexual assault counts.

“That ends a two-decade plus saga of an innocent man wrongfully arrested, wrongfully tried, wrongfully convicted and wrongfully sent to prison for a crime he didn’t commit,” said Starks’ attorney, Jed Stone.

Starks still must deal with an aggravated battery charge the appeals court didn’t reverse. His attorneys maintain he is innocent of all charges. The State’s Attorney would not comment on the aggravated battery count.

Starks joins two other Lake County men — Juan Rivera and Jerry Hobbs — who’ve recently left prison after having charges dropped.

Source: http://www.nbcchicago.com/news/local/Charges-Dropped-Against-Man-in-1986-Rape-151557545.html#ixzz1v3EER3F4

 

‘Crimson’ Reports on Due Process Concerns as Harvard Revises Sexual Assault Policy

William Creeley
May 14, 2012

Last Friday, The Harvard Crimson updated readers on Harvard University’s ongoing study of its sexual assault policies, noting that the university’s policy options have been affected by the controversial April 4, 2011, “Dear Colleague” letter from the Department of Education’s Office for Civil Rights (OCR). Zeroing in on the ongoing debate about OCR’s decision to mandate the use of the “preponderance of the evidence” standard of proof in campus sexual misconduct proceedings, Crimson staff writer Rebecca D. Robbins writes:

As Harvard’s peer institutions move to update their sexual misconduct policies by lowering the standard of evidence required for a guilty conviction, two lawyers interviewed for this article say that these universities’ changes may encourage Harvard to follow suit.

The University is currently in the midst of a two-year process of reviewing its sexual assault policies to ensure that it is compliant with federal anti-discrimination law.

In April 2011, the Office for Civil Rights released a “Dear Colleague” letter outlining stricter guidelines for colleges and universities for dealing with sexual assault complaints in the wake of a stream of Title IX complaints filed against institutions of higher education, including Harvard Law School.

Last month, both the University of Pennsylvania and Cornell announced that they would modify their sexual assault policies, joining Yale and Stanford in altering their standards in response to the letter. Both the University of Pennsylvania and Cornell adopted the lower standard of “preponderance of the evidence” mandated by the “Dear Colleague” letter, which allows an accused student to be found guilty if the institution is at least 51 percent certain of his or her responsibility for an alleged incident. Previously, some institutions, including Harvard Law School and Princeton, had used a higher “burden of proof” standard, which required “clear and convincing” evidence of the accused student’s guilt.

FIRE has led the charge against OCR’s “preponderance of the evidence” mandate, pointing out that reducing the standard of evidence used in campus sexual misconduct hearings will result in more incorrect verdicts, a less reliable judicial process for all parties, and reduced due process rights for accused students. And as I’ve noted here on The Torch recently, OCR’s mandate has forced institutions like Cornell University and the University of North Carolina to establish a “two-tiered” judicial system, as students accused of sexual misconduct face a lower burden of proof than students accused of other conduct violations. For our full argument, check out FIRE’s May 5, 2011, response to OCR, our FAQ, or our “Dear Colleague” letter case page.

Speaking to The Crimson, Professor Peter Lake, Director of the Center for Higher Education Law and Policy at Stetson University College of Law, noted the pressure felt by institutions like Harvard to comply with the federal mandate, despite potential reservations about its effect on student rights:

Lake said that the release of the “Dear Colleague” letter sparked a flurry of changes among many institutions, who swiftly revised their policies in accordance with the new Title IX regulations.

“Certainly schools felt a tremendous pressure to scramble as quickly as they could to figure out how to come into compliance,” Lake said.

Lake said he anticipates a legal battle about the constitutionality of the “preponderance of the evidence” standard, which he thinks may violate accused students’ constitutional right of due process.

Lake added that he thinks the “Dear Colleague” letter puts institutions like Harvard in a difficult position.

Colleges and universities must face the question: “Do I hold out and violate a federal mandate and face sanctions, or do I potentially violate the due process rights of students?’” Lake said. “That’s a heck of a choice.” [Emphases added.]

We share Lake’s concerns. By eliminating institutional autonomy to implement appropriate evidentiary standards, OCR has delivered schools like Harvard an impossible ultimatum: Reduce student due process rights, or lose federal funding.

Source: http://thefire.org/torch/#14479

 

President’s Advisors Raise Possibility of a Veto of VAWA

May 15, 2012

EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT
OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20503
May 15, 2012
(House Rules)
STATEMENT OF ADMINISTRATION POLICY
H.R. 4970 – Violence Against Women Reauthorization Act of 2012
(Rep. Adams, R-FL, and 40 cosponsors)

The Administration strongly opposes H.R. 4970, a bill that would undermine the core principles of the Violence Against Women Act (VAWA). VAWA is a landmark piece of legislation that first passed the Congress in 1994 and has twice been reauthorized with overwhelming bipartisan support, each time with important improvements to strengthen VAWA. The Act transformed the Nation’s response to violence against women and brought critically needed resources to States and local communities to address these crimes.
H.R. 4970 retreats from this forward progress by failing to include several critical provisions that are part of the Senate-passed VAWA reauthorization bill. For instance, H.R. 4970 fails to provide for concurrent special domestic violence criminal jurisdiction by tribal authorities over non-Indians, and omits clarification of tribal courts’ full civil jurisdiction regarding certain protection orders over non-Indians. Given that three out of five Native American women experience domestic violence in their lifetime, these omissions in H.R. 4970 are unacceptable. The bill also fails to include language that would prohibit discrimination against LGBT victims in VAWA grant programs. No sexual assault or domestic violence victim should be beaten, hurt, or killed because they could not access needed support, assistance, and protection. In addition, H.R. 4970 does not include important improvements to the Clery Act found in the Senate-passed bill that would address the high rates of dating violence and sexual assault experienced by young people in college and other higher education institutions. The bill also weakens critical new provisions in the Senate-passed bill that would improve safety for victims living in subsidized housing.
H.R. 4970 also takes direct aim at immigrant victims of domestic violence and sexual assault by removing critical protections currently in law. H.R. 4970 allows abusers to be notified when a victim files a VAWA self-petition for relief, and it eliminates the path to citizenship for U visa holders – victims of serious crimes such as torture, rape, and domestic violence – who are cooperating with law enforcement in the investigation or prosecution of these crimes. These proposals senselessly remove existing legal protections, undermine VAWA’s core purpose of protecting victims of sexual assault and domestic violence, frustrate important law enforcement objectives, and jeopardize victims by placing them directly in harm’s way.
The Administration urges the House to find common ground with the bipartisan Senate-passed bill and consider and pass legislation that will protect all victims. H.R. 4970 rolls back existing law and removes long-standing protections for victims of domestic violence and sexual assault – crimes that predominately affect women. If the President is presented with H.R. 4970, his senior advisors would recommend that he veto the bill.

Source: http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/omb/legislative/sap/112/saphr4970r_20120515.pdf

 

PRESS RELEASE

Contact: Teri Stoddard
Telephone: 301-801-0608
Email: tstoddard@saveservices.org

SAVE Calls on Lawmakers to Stand Tall for Victims and the Constitution during Upcoming VAWA Vote

Washington, DC/May 15, 2012 – A leading victim-advocacy organization is calling on Representatives to support reauthorization of the Violence Against Women Act, H.R. 4970. Stop Abusive and Violent Environments (SAVE) says H.R. 4970 will best help victims of partner abuse and safeguard Constitutional protections.

SAVE urges lawmakers to resist attempts to expand definitions of domestic violence, stalking, and sexual assault. Overly-broad definitions encourage false allegations of abuse and make it harder for true victims to be heard.

Since its passage in 1994, the Violence Against Women Act (VAWA) has sparked controversy. The ACLU once termed VAWA’s mandatory arrest provisions “repugnant” to the Constitution, and in 2000 the U.S. Supreme Court overturned a VAWA provision designed to provide a federal civil remedy for sex assault cases.

One area of particular controversy centers on VAWA’s immigration provisions, which allow a foreign national to claim to be a domestic violence victim without provision of evidence. Under current law, the accused person is deprived of key due process protections and is barred from submitting evidence of immigration fraud. One civil rights expert termed such provisions “Kafka-esque.” (http://www.mindingthecampus.com/originals/2012/03/the_new_vawaa_threat_to_college_students.html)

Last year the Senate Judiciary Committee invited testimony from Julie Poner, who was a victim of false allegations made by her former husband from the Czech Republic. Saying she had “suffered unimaginable consequences,” Poner lamented the countless men and women “who have lost access to their children, their homes, their jobs, and in some cases their freedom because of false allegations of abuse.” (http://www.judiciary.senate.gov/pdf/11-07-13%20Poner%20Testimony.pdf)

“Our nation was founded on due process protections such as the right of the accused to be advised of the charges, to confront his accuser, and to be afforded the opportunity to refute the accusations,” notes SAVE spokesman Philip Cook. “But under the existing VAWA, the accused is stripped of these Constitutional protections, affording more rights to the accuser than to the American citizen. This is a slap in the face to notions of justice and fairness.”

Stop Abusive and Violent Environments is a victim-advocacy organization working for evidence-based solutions to partner violence: www.saveservices.org

.

 

Sex offender with violent history arrested in beating death of wife in Conway neighborhood

By Susan Jacobson

May 14, 2012

June Royer was trying to be nice when she let Guillermo Cardona, his wife and their baby daughter stay in her house.

The family was living in a truck at the time, and Cardona, 44, promised to do odd jobs for Royer.

On Friday, Royer, 75, was shocked to find police at the door of her home in the Conway neighborhood of Orange County. Shock turned to horror when emergency workers kicked in the bedroom that Cardona and his wife, Jennifer, shared and found the 25-year-old mother dead.

Cardona, who is known as Willie, remained in jail without bail Monday on charges of second-degree murder and domestic battery. He called 911 Friday evening and told a dispatcher he thought his wife was dead because he had hit her and kicked her in the stomach, records show.

“I’ll go back in that room and I’ll always think of it,” Royer said Saturday. “It’s awful.”

Royer said the couple spent most of their time in the bedroom. Cardona, she said, told her they wanted privacy.

Royer said she once heard banging on the wall, but she is hard of hearing and thought little of it. Royer’s grown son, who also lives with her, told her he heard the couple fighting often, but neither of them intervened or called the police.

On Friday about 4:15 a.m., Royer’s son awoke her and said, “They’re fighting again,” she said.

It’s possible that the fatal blows were delivered then, according to a sheriff’s report. Cardona told investigators that his wife was in pain and could not keep liquids down after he kicked her. He fell asleep, awoke to find that she was not breathing, panicked and left the house, the report states.

About 7:30 p.m. as Royer prepared dinner, she looked outside and saw the flashing lights of police cars and firetrucks that were responding to Cardona’s 911 call.

Cardona left their daughter, who Royer said is 7 months old, with his sister about 7 p.m. He returned to Royer’s house about 10 p.m. and was taken into custody by Orange County sheriff’s detectives.

Cardona is a registered sex offender convicted in 1998 in Lake County of having sex with two 13-year-old girls and a 15-year-old. He spent time in prison in the early 1990s for aggravated assault, criminal mischief, burglary and a false-imprisonment case involving his first wife.

Source: Orlando Sentinel

 

Yolanda Lenette Stills Killed Fiance Over Cigarette, Florida Cops Say

By Andy Campbell

May 14, 2012

A Florida woman is under fire this week after she allegedly stabbed her fiance dead because he wouldn’t give her a cigarette.

Yolanda Stills, 43, was arrested Saturday morning in connection to the stabbing death of her 56-year-old fiance, Ricardo McMillian, according to WJXT.

Stills allegedly went on a rampage when her beau wouldn’t hand over a cancer stick.

“She wanted a cigarette from him, and evidently he wouldn’t give her one, so she went and retrieved a 10-inch butcher knife and stabbed him,” Lt. Rob Schoonover of the Jacksonville Sheriff’s Office told the station.

McMillian was found in the front yard of his apartment with several stab wounds. He was taken to the hospital where he died.

Stills was charged with murder and is being held at the Duval County Jail without bail.

Cops told the station that Stills and McMillian had been living together for months, and neighbors said nothing about them was unusual.

Stills, on the other hand, is used to visits from the police. She’s reportedly been arrested 34 times and has faced several charges, including armed and aggravated assault, and most recently a protection order violation, the Florida Times-Union reported.

She spent 42 days in jail for that charge, and was released in January.

Source: HuffingtonPost

 

Fight about Violence Against Women Act takes nasty turn in Ohio

GOP committee revives 1986 domestic violence allegations against Sherrod Brown

By Deidre Shesgreen

May 7, 2012

WASHINGTON — The political fight about the Violence Against Women Act has hit a new level of nasty, at least in Ohio.

The National Republican Senatorial Committee sent out a link Monday to a story, written by a conservative website, reviving 26-year-old domestic violence allegations made against Sen. Sherrod Brown by his wife during a messy divorce.

Brown’s ex-wife, Larke Recchie, since has characterized the allegations she made during the 1986 proceeding as “angry words” made during an “unfriendly ordeal.”

In a statement issued Monday, in the wake of the NRSC’s missive, she criticized Josh Mandel, Brown’s opponent for the U.S. Senate, for “dirty campaigning.”

“I understand that in campaigns you often have to go after your opponent, but Josh Mandel should know better than to go after our family,” said Recchie, who since has remarried. “I ask that he immediately put a stop to this kind of politics. I was proud to support Sherrod in 2006, and I’m proud to support him again this time around against Josh Mandel. Josh Mandel should immediately disavow this kind of dirty campaigning.”

A spokesman for Mandel, Travis Considine, declined to respond to questions.

The NRSC forwarded the story to reporters without comment. The NRSC is the Senate GOP’s campaign arm, charged with helping Republican candidates as the party tries to win control of the chamber this November. Ohio’s contest pitting Brown, a Democrat, against Mandel, his GOP challenger, will be critical to determining the Senate majority in 2013.

The publication that published the story on Recchie’s allegations is the Washington Free Beacon, run by the Center for American Freedom, a conservative advocacy group.

The story comes in the midst of a heated congressional battle about reauthorizing the Violence Against Women Act, a federal law that funds programs to help battered women and curb domestic violence and sexual assault.

Brown (along with Ohio’s GOP Sen. Rob Portman) voted in favor of the reauthorization in April, and Brown has highlighted his support for the measure. His campaign also has criticized Mandel for refusing to say whether he would have voted to reauthorize the law. Some Republicans in Congress oppose the Senate version of the reauthorization because it would expand the law to bar shelters from discriminating against gays and lesbians in abusive relationships, provide more temporary visas for battered women who are in the U.S. illegally and extend protection to American Indian women.

“Ohioans deserve to know if Josh Mandel supports reauthorization of the Violence Against Woman Act without any of Josh’s typical sidestepping, question dodging and avoidance of critical issues affecting our state,” a spokesperson for Brown’s campaign said in an email blast to reporters in April. Later that day, Mandel’s campaign issued a statement saying he supported a “clean” reauthorization of the law.

Brown’s campaign spokesman, Justin Barasky, said the NRSC’s decision to circulate the conservative web story is an underhanded attempt to distract from Mandel’s squishiness on the law. Barasky also said it’s typical of Mandel’s “gutter” campaign style.

He pointed to a highly controversial ad that Mandel ran in his 2010 campaign for state treasurer — the post he currently holds — trying to insinuate that his opponent, Kevin Boyce, was a Muslim. (Boyce is a Christian.) Mandel’s campaign eventually pulled that spot after a torrent of criticism.

“Unfortunately it appears Josh Mandel hasn’t changed course from his past smear campaigns of misleading statements and outright lies against his opponents, and has crawled back into the gutter with a despicably false attack on Senator Brown’s family,” Barasky said in a statement.

Source: Newark Advocate

 

Husband relives horror of moment petite blonde wife plunged steak knife into his chest after years of domestic abuse

May 14, 2012

A man who was subjected to terrifying violence at the hands of his petite wife has described the moment she plunged a steak knife into his heart.

Kieron Bell, 36, only found the courage to leave his wife Sarah after she stabbed him and left him to die.

Even after she was jailed Kieron found it hard to admit he had been a victim of domestic violence at the hands of his wife.

But he hopes telling his story will encourage more men to come forward.

He said: ‘There is a misconception that men who are victims are weak but that couldn’t be more wrong.’

Kieron, of Great Yarmouth, Norfolk, was a strapping nightclub bouncer when he became a victim of domestic violence.

Though the married father of one had no problem throwing drunks out of nightclubs night after night, in his own home he was the victim of a series of brutal attacks – at the hands of his pretty young wife.

Petite Sarah Bell, then 24, had attacked her husband regularly since they married in June 2006.

But her reign of violence ended when she stabbed Kieron through the heart with a steak knife at their flat and the police were called.

Kieron nearly died, but lying Sarah tried to persuade police that Kieron had fallen on the knife.

After life saving heart surgery which has left him with a ten inch scar on his chest, Kieron has made a slow recovery, but now wants to warn other men not to tolerate violence in a relationship.

‘I stayed because I loved her and because we had a child but it nearly cost me my life. I’m lucky to be alive and one day I will have to tell my son that his mother almost killed me.’

‘Domestic violence against men is a big problem. Because women are seen as the vulnerable ones, people don’t understand how men can allow themselves to be victims.’

‘I’m speaking out because when I finally found the courage to tell Norfolk Police what had happened they were brilliant, they didn’t judge me and they took me seriously so I want other men to know they can report attacks.

‘If it can happen to me it can happen to anyone.’

But following their marriage at Great Yarmouth registry office, Sarah started to show signs of a ferocious temper. ‘She would flare up at the smallest thing. I put it down to her pregnancy hormones to start with.’

But as Sarah’s bump grew she started to become violent. ‘If we were bickering she would suddenly lash out. She would kick me or punch me. Sometimes she slapped me in front of people.

‘I would never in a million years hit a woman because my mother always told me not to so I would go out for a walk to calm down.’

‘When I come back she would say sorry and promise not to do it again.’

‘I was confused and to start with never even considered what was happening as domestic violence because you just don’t think it happens to blokes.’

But Sarah’s violence got worse and on one occasion she hit her husband with a glass bottle.

Kieron did call police to the flat, but was scared they would laugh if he told them he was being abused by his wife.

Kieron met Sarah when he was working the door of a Great Yarmouth nightclub.

At 5ft 10ins tall and with a stocky build, Kieron had a reputation as a gentle giant.

Sarah was a tiny size eight blonde and just and 5ft 2ins tall. After a whirlwind romance they discovered Sarah was expecting and decided to marry.

‘We were really happy and I thought she was a great girl. I thought we’d be the perfect family.’

He hoped her behaviour would improve when their baby was born.

Their son was born in February 2007 and Sarah’s temper worsened. ‘Arguments normally started over the flat, If I hadn’t done enough jobs or it wasn’t tidy enough. One time in a row she threatened to stab me but I never thought she ever would.’

Ashamed to admit what was happening, he kept the violence a secret from friends and family. The police were called several more times but Kieron was always too ashamed to take it any further.

‘I didn’t expect them to believe me, I mean who’s going to think a big former doorman can be battered by a tiny little woman. People wouldn’t take it seriously.’

Social services had become concerned about Sarah’s temper and her son was moved into the care of Keiron’s aunt, but nobody suspected that Kieron too was in danger.

But on the 22 April 2009 at 1.45am Sarah came home later and started an argument with Kieron after accusing him of not doing enough around the house.

‘It was typical of her to start an argument about the house, but no matter how much I did she would never be happy.’

Moments later she ran at him with a steak knife from their kitchen, plunging it into his chest and fleeing as Kieron slumped dying on the floor in a pool of blood.

He called 999 and an ambulance arrived as Sarah returned and in front of medics urged her husband to tell them it was ‘nobody’s fault.’ ‘Tell them honey,’ she pleaded as he slipped into unconsciousness.

They rushed him to hospital for heart surgery. Sarah tried to persuade police that Kieron fell on the knife, but Kieron later admitted the truth, that he was a victim of domestic violence.

Sarah was arrested while he underwent life saving open heart surgery and spent a week in hospital.

‘They said I was lucky to be alive. The knife had missed my heart by a millimetre and I was in intensive care for five days.’

‘When I finally admitted how long it had been going on I was relieved it was out in the open and surprised at how good Norfolk Police were. Nobody treated it as a joke in fact they told me more was being done to help men in my situation.

‘They gave me a lot of support in the run up to the case. Now I know there is no shame in what happened to me.

Kieron moved in with his aunt and son to recover. ‘He came and gave me a really big cuddle. I felt lucky to be alive.

‘I couldn’t even pick my boy up to start with, that’s when it really struck me what she’d done. She could have killed me, but she didn’t think twice about taking away our son’s dad.

‘Admitting to people what had been going on was hard but having the police take it so seriously helped.

Sarah pleaded guilty to wounding with intent and was sentenced to four a half years at Norwich Crown Court. She is due for release this month.

Kieron has now married again but says the domestic violence he suffered will always affect him. ‘ I found it very hard to trust because of what happened.’

Kieron decided to speak out in the hope of encouraging more men to come forward.

After the case Det Insp Paul Garrard from Norfolk Police’s domestic violence unit said that nobody regardless of gender needs to tolerate domestic abuse.

‘Domestic abuse presents itself in many ways, it’s about power and control. We are committed not only to investigation reports of domestic violence but also to encouraging victims, regardless of gender, to come forward to and report such matters.

‘Policing domestic violence has come a long way over the years.’

Source: Daily Mail

© 2012 SAVE: Stop Abusive and Violent Environments Privacy | Terms of Service Suffusion theme by Sayontan Sinha